2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofit potential of coal-fired power plants in China: The technology lock-in and cost optimization perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible method to reduce the stranded risk is to introduce CCS technology into coal power plants. As Fan pointed out in a previous study (Fan et al 2018), if CCS commercialization can be achieved in 2030, the CCS retrofitting potential would reach 460 GW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible method to reduce the stranded risk is to introduce CCS technology into coal power plants. As Fan pointed out in a previous study (Fan et al 2018), if CCS commercialization can be achieved in 2030, the CCS retrofitting potential would reach 460 GW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Wand et al analyzed the low-carbon transitions of China's power system with the China TIMES model, and concluded that investing in coal-based power plants could become uneconomic once a stringent climate target is introduced into the system (Wang et al 2019). Fan et al explored the carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofit potential of coalfired power plants in China and concluded that CCS should realize commercialization before 2040 to make CCS retrofit a cost-effective solution (Fan et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to achieve net zero or even negative emissions in the coal power industry has become the key to achieving net zero emissions globally. At present, on the premise of not adding huge stranded assets caused by coal phase‐out, there are three technical solutions for low‐carbon transformation of coal‐fired power plants, namely carbon capture and storage (CCS), biomass‐coal co‐firing and co‐firing with CCS (Fan et al., 2018; Guo & Huang, 2020; Singh & Rao, 2016; Wang & Du, 2016; Welfle et al., 2020; Wu et al, 2014). Among these technologies, only biomass‐coal co‐firing with CCS can actually realize the net zero emission of coal‐fired power plant, which can extract carbon dioxide from atmosphere while co‐firing or CCS technology can only reduce carbon emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon capture and storage technology is one of the most promising options to solve the global environmental crisis [1][2]. CO2 transportation by the large-scale long-distance pipelines may pass through factories, ports and cities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%