2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon accounting of material substitution with biomass: Case studies for Austria investigated with IPCC default and alternative approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this accounting approach is maintained, carbon savings calculated here would not materialize in the national GHG inventory [cf. 13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If this accounting approach is maintained, carbon savings calculated here would not materialize in the national GHG inventory [cf. 13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect is usually termed ‘product/material substitution’ [cf. 2,13,14]. And, second, is the ‘carbon stock/pool/storage effect’; it refers to the fact that carbon remains fixed in wood products throughout their service life.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat was assumed to be produced from natural gas-based boilers, this being the most likely thermal energy source for individual producers (in the absence of a connection to district heating). The marginal product for insulation was identified in glass wool, on the basis of the information reported in Kalt et al (2016). With respect to the marginal source of the wood, it should be noticed that, along with post-consumer wood waste to be managed, two additional wood biomasses were involved in the assessment: the virgin wood products whose provision and manufacture is avoided through wood waste recycling (scenario A1 to C4 and E1; see Figure 1 and Appendix C), and wood pellets constituting a share of the marginal mix for electricity supply (39% of the total) and also representing one of the wood waste recycling applications (scenario F1; see Figure 1).…”
Section: Identification Of Marginal Processes and Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been formed into two types of accounting systems: the top-down system and down-up system. Among the examples of the top-down system, the 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was the most typical case (Kalt et al 2016;Schueler et al 2018). The IPCC approach measured carbon emission sources through a layer-by-layer classification to obtain the final carbon emissions.…”
Section: Carbon Emissions Accounting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%