2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-29452009000300042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Características agronômicas de seis genótipos de maracujazeiro-azedo cultivados no Distrito Federal

Abstract: rEsUMO -este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar as características agronômicas de seis genótipos de maracujazeiro-azedo cultivados no distrito Federal. o experimento foi desenvolvido na área experimental da Fazenda Água limpa da universidade de Brasília, no dF. utilizou-se o delineamento em blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições, seis tratamentos e sete plantas por parcela. Foram avaliados os genótipos: Rubi gigante, ec-3-0, ec-l-7, Rc-3, Redondão e gigante amarelo. os parâmetros analisados, durante seis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we found higher values for FW, LD, and SST than those obtained by Silva et al (2012) while evaluating 144 full-sib progenies derived from the second cycle of recurrent selection. Abreu et al (2009) found values that were lower than those obtained in this study for FW, WP, SST, and NS for the cultivar Gigante Amarelo.…”
Section: Descriptorscontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we found higher values for FW, LD, and SST than those obtained by Silva et al (2012) while evaluating 144 full-sib progenies derived from the second cycle of recurrent selection. Abreu et al (2009) found values that were lower than those obtained in this study for FW, WP, SST, and NS for the cultivar Gigante Amarelo.…”
Section: Descriptorscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Negreiros et al (2008) report that both the juice industry and the fresh fruit market regard skin thickness as a relevant factor in fruit ranking because it is inversely proportional to juice yield. The hybrid EC-L-7 (Sul Brasil x Marília), which was rated by Abreu et al (2009), showed an average skin thickness of 7.0 mm and a WP value of 37.75 g. In this study, group III obtained an average skin thickness of 6.6 mm and a WP value of 77.03 g, which indicates that selection over time was effective for these traits. Akamine and Girolami (1959) found a positive correlation between the NS per fruit and juice content; thus, a larger NS tends to provide higher yields of juice.…”
Section: Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Studies on the agronomic traits of different yellow passion fruit genotypes cultivated in the Federal District have demonstrated distinct behavior for EC-3-0. According to these data, genotype EC-3-0 presented superior performance, with a total yield of 15,460 (ABREU et al, 2009) and 26,480 kg ha -1 (JUNQUEIRA et al, 2003). Coimbra et al (2012), Maia et al (2009), andJunqueira et al (2003) observed a superior performance for EC-RAM in relation to the other genotypes, with an estimated total yield of 43,287; 13,968; and 32,880 kg ha -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The agronomic performance was evaluated at one year after planting, from November 2009 to April 2010, totaling 20 harvests. Fruits were weekly harvested from the ground, weighed, and classified according to their equatorial diameter (D), as follows: 1C (D ≤ 55 mm); 1B (55 < D ≤ 65 mm); 1A (65 < D ≤ 75 mm); 2A (75 < D ≤ 90 mm); 3A (D > 90 mm) (ABREU et al, 2009). Estimated yield (kg ha -1 ) and number of fruits per hectare (considering 9,697 plants per hectare), and fruit weight (g) were evaluated for all diameter classes together (total), as well as for each diameter class.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zaccheo et al (2012) found ratio values in passion fruit hybrids close to those of the present study, ranging from 4.3 to 2.6. Abreu et al (2009) found for BRS Gigante Amarelo cultivar, ratio value of 1.92. In general, it was observed that populations and cultivars presented physicochemical characteristics that meet the quality demanded by both fresh market and industry.…”
Section: Productivity Fruit Physicochemical Quality and Distinctivenmentioning
confidence: 81%