Caractérisation des échanges entre patients et médecins : approche outillée d’un corpus de consultations médicales

Abstract

Purpan et Inserm U558), intitulé « Interactions médecin/patient en médecine générale et inégalités sociales de santé : analyses interdisciplinaires ». Outre l'Inserm, les participants au projet sont, à Toulouse, les laboratoires LISST CIEU (UMR 5193), SOI-PRISMH (EA 3690), LERASS (EA 827), CLLE-ERSS (UMR 5263), et à Nantes, le PIMESP (CHU Nantes).

Patient Acceptance of Translation Technology for Medical Dialogues in Emergency Situations

“…Incomplete sentences. Medical dialogues are known for containing a lot of incomplete sentences (Tanguy et al, 2011), which are problematic for MT (Mutal et al, 2020). We have also observed in former studies that doctors tend to speak in keywords when they feel that speech recognition doesn't work well (Bouillon et al, 2017).…”

A Speech-enabled Fixed-phrase Translator for Healthcare Accessibility

“…In dialogues, elliptical utterances are very common, since they ensure the principle of economy and usually avoid duplication (Hamza, 2019). In BabelDr, they allow doctors to question patients in a more efficient way (Tanguy et al, 2011). However, literal translation of these utterances could affect communication as illustrated in Table 1.…”

Integrating Multidisciplinary Results to Produce New Knowledge About the Physician–Patient Relationship

“…Each team employed their own analytical framework to characterize physician–patient interaction and then to explore the relationship between physician–patient interaction and the patient’s social context. Finally, after the first two objectives had been met and each disciplinary team was to publish in their own field of research ( Genolini, Roca, Rolland, & Membrado, 2011 ; Kelly-Irving et al, 2008 ; Kelly-Irving et al, 2009 ; Kelly-Irving et al, 2011 ; Membrado, 2014 ; Schieber et al, 2011 ; Schieber et al, 2012 ; Tanguy, Fabre, Ho-Dac, & Rebeyrolle, 2011 ), the third key challenge of the INTERMEDE project remained: to integrate the results produced by each discipline in order to produce a core of knowledge and shared hypotheses that will be central to the formulation of public health recommendations.…”