Abstract:Setting and participants: Problem drug users aged 16-54 resident within Greater Manchester who attended community based statutory drug treatment agencies, were in contact with general practitioners, were assessed by arrest referral workers, were in contact with the probation service, or arrested under the Misuse of Drugs Act for offences involving possession of opioids, cocaine, or benzodiazepines. Design: Multi-sample stratified capture-recapture analysis. Patterns of overlaps between data sources were modell… Show more
“…In confirming this, Gemmell et al (27) aimed at establishing the prevalence of problem drug use in the 10 local authorities within the Metropolitan County of Greater Manchester between April 2000 and March 2001 using a multisample stratified capture-recapture analysis. The total number of problem drug users in Greater Manchester was estimated to be 19 255 giving a prevalence of problem drug use of 13.7 per 1000 population aged 16-54.…”
Section: Intra-urban Differences and Substance Misuse Levelsmentioning
Purpose of the review: More than half of the world population is living in urban areas, but the evidence about urban-rural differences in drug use is not clearly defined. The present paper aims at reviewing the international literature addressing the role of urbanization and related parameters in association with substance misuse. In particular, the evidence of urbanization being a risk factor for substance misuse will be here examined. Recent findings: Although it has been suggested that substance misuse is typically a characteristic of large urban areas, this did not appear to be a consistent observation from the present literature review. Furthermore, the urban context may offer a relative proximity of health services and prompter emergency intervention in case of overdose. Summary: Although more efforts have to be put into explaining substance misuse in general, identifying which characteristics of the urban context, and under which circumstances, are modifiable, is an important theoretical, empirical, and public health question
“…In confirming this, Gemmell et al (27) aimed at establishing the prevalence of problem drug use in the 10 local authorities within the Metropolitan County of Greater Manchester between April 2000 and March 2001 using a multisample stratified capture-recapture analysis. The total number of problem drug users in Greater Manchester was estimated to be 19 255 giving a prevalence of problem drug use of 13.7 per 1000 population aged 16-54.…”
Section: Intra-urban Differences and Substance Misuse Levelsmentioning
Purpose of the review: More than half of the world population is living in urban areas, but the evidence about urban-rural differences in drug use is not clearly defined. The present paper aims at reviewing the international literature addressing the role of urbanization and related parameters in association with substance misuse. In particular, the evidence of urbanization being a risk factor for substance misuse will be here examined. Recent findings: Although it has been suggested that substance misuse is typically a characteristic of large urban areas, this did not appear to be a consistent observation from the present literature review. Furthermore, the urban context may offer a relative proximity of health services and prompter emergency intervention in case of overdose. Summary: Although more efforts have to be put into explaining substance misuse in general, identifying which characteristics of the urban context, and under which circumstances, are modifiable, is an important theoretical, empirical, and public health question
“…In a parallel study to that described here (Gemmell, Millar, & Hay, 2004), PDU period prevalence estimates were obtained for 2000-2001 for each of the ten local government areas within Greater Manchester, an urban conurbation in North West England with a population of around 2.5 million. As in previous UK studies (Beynon et al, 2001;Hickman et al, 1999;Wood, Bloor, & Palmer, 2000), a problem drug user was defined as: 'A person who experiences social, psychological, physical, or legal problems related to intoxication and/or regular excessive consumption and/or dependence as a consequence of his/her own use of drugs or chemical substances' the definition was refined to include only users of opiates, cocaine and/or benzodiazepines.…”
This study investigates whether hypotheses about trends in the prevalence of problem drug use (PDU), prompted by capture-recapture based age-specific prevalence estimates, are corroborated by estimates of trends in incidence. Lag correction techniques were used to provide incidence estimates adjusted for the time-lag between onset of drug use and its first recorded treatment for heroin users seeking treatment in three areas of North West England between 1986 and 2000 (n ¼ 4142). The incidence trends indicated geographical variation in the progress of heroin 'epidemics' in the areas studied and corroborated previously estimated prevalence rates that suggested PDU has passed its peak and is declining in some areas, but continues to increase in others. The lag correction method is capable of producing estimates that will improve our understanding of changes in the size and composition of the population targeted for drug misuse treatment and may provide a basis on which to forecast the direction of future trends.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.