The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1080/16066350600906552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How well do trends in incidence of heroin use reflect hypothesised trends in prevalence of problem drug use in the North West of England?

Abstract: This study investigates whether hypotheses about trends in the prevalence of problem drug use (PDU), prompted by capture-recapture based age-specific prevalence estimates, are corroborated by estimates of trends in incidence. Lag correction techniques were used to provide incidence estimates adjusted for the time-lag between onset of drug use and its first recorded treatment for heroin users seeking treatment in three areas of North West England between 1986 and 2000 (n ¼ 4142). The incidence trends indicated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this paper has shown, a large proportion of problem drug users in the North East are from the younger age range. Previous research suggests this age distribution is characteristic of a recent increase in incidence whereby young people have joined the using population, and an increase in prevalence is an expected outcome (Millar, Gemmell, Hay, Heller, & Donmall, 2006). It is acknowledged that insufficient time has lapsed between the two study periods to report confidently on trends, and any significant changes should be interpreted as a possible change in prevalence rather than evidence of a definite change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As this paper has shown, a large proportion of problem drug users in the North East are from the younger age range. Previous research suggests this age distribution is characteristic of a recent increase in incidence whereby young people have joined the using population, and an increase in prevalence is an expected outcome (Millar, Gemmell, Hay, Heller, & Donmall, 2006). It is acknowledged that insufficient time has lapsed between the two study periods to report confidently on trends, and any significant changes should be interpreted as a possible change in prevalence rather than evidence of a definite change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, it is an encouraging sign for London and the North West (with high prevalence rates) that their injector age group ratios (15–34 to 35–64 years) are relatively low compared with England as a whole (posterior mean 1.59 for males and 2.24 for females; and see Millar et al . () for further detailed discussion of problem drug use in the North West up to 2001). Regions with high injector ratios by age group may have experienced later diffusion with younger injectors predominating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, De Angelis et al (2004) find that though there is a moderate downturn in incidence between 1980 and 1985, prevalence of heroin addiction in the UK grew from 1968 to 2000, with especially large increases in the 1990s. Research from the north-west of England suggests that, during the 1990s, initiation into heroin use may have started to fall in areas which had seen big increases in the 1980s (Millar et al, 2006), even if it continued to increase in other areas.…”
Section: Heroinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few health indicators have shown such rapid deterioration over such a long period. I t a l y P o r t u g a l S p a i n A u s t r i a I r e l a n d F i n l a n d S w e d e n F r a n c e N e t h e r l a n d s G e r m a n y P o l a n d (Millar et al, 2006), even if it continued to increase in other areas.…”
Section: Heroinmentioning
confidence: 99%