Abstract:This study investigates whether hypotheses about trends in the prevalence of problem drug use (PDU), prompted by capture-recapture based age-specific prevalence estimates, are corroborated by estimates of trends in incidence. Lag correction techniques were used to provide incidence estimates adjusted for the time-lag between onset of drug use and its first recorded treatment for heroin users seeking treatment in three areas of North West England between 1986 and 2000 (n ¼ 4142). The incidence trends indicated … Show more
“…As this paper has shown, a large proportion of problem drug users in the North East are from the younger age range. Previous research suggests this age distribution is characteristic of a recent increase in incidence whereby young people have joined the using population, and an increase in prevalence is an expected outcome (Millar, Gemmell, Hay, Heller, & Donmall, 2006). It is acknowledged that insufficient time has lapsed between the two study periods to report confidently on trends, and any significant changes should be interpreted as a possible change in prevalence rather than evidence of a definite change.…”
Aims: The aim of this study was to establish prevalence estimates of problem drug use, defined as opiate and/or crack cocaine use by persons aged 15 to 64 years, for England and for each of the 149 administrative areas responsible for commissioning drug interventions. Methods: Indirect estimation techniques, the capture-recapture and multiple indicator methods, were used to obtain estimates. Information on problem drug users presenting to healthcare settings and/or recorded by the criminal justice system, and drug-related indicator data were used in the analyses. Findings: There were an estimated 332,090 problem drug users in England during 2005/06 (95% CI 324,546 to 346,345), equivalent to 9.97 (95% CI 9.74 to 10.40) problem drug users per thousand population aged 15 to 64 years. Prevalence varied by geographic region and age group: the highest rates were observed in London and for those aged 25 to 34 years. Conclusions: This study has produced estimates of the prevalence of problem drug use in England that are more robust, more precise, and suggest a higher prevalence than previous studies. The estimates provide a basis on which to formulate policy, plan services, and measure service performance.
“…As this paper has shown, a large proportion of problem drug users in the North East are from the younger age range. Previous research suggests this age distribution is characteristic of a recent increase in incidence whereby young people have joined the using population, and an increase in prevalence is an expected outcome (Millar, Gemmell, Hay, Heller, & Donmall, 2006). It is acknowledged that insufficient time has lapsed between the two study periods to report confidently on trends, and any significant changes should be interpreted as a possible change in prevalence rather than evidence of a definite change.…”
Aims: The aim of this study was to establish prevalence estimates of problem drug use, defined as opiate and/or crack cocaine use by persons aged 15 to 64 years, for England and for each of the 149 administrative areas responsible for commissioning drug interventions. Methods: Indirect estimation techniques, the capture-recapture and multiple indicator methods, were used to obtain estimates. Information on problem drug users presenting to healthcare settings and/or recorded by the criminal justice system, and drug-related indicator data were used in the analyses. Findings: There were an estimated 332,090 problem drug users in England during 2005/06 (95% CI 324,546 to 346,345), equivalent to 9.97 (95% CI 9.74 to 10.40) problem drug users per thousand population aged 15 to 64 years. Prevalence varied by geographic region and age group: the highest rates were observed in London and for those aged 25 to 34 years. Conclusions: This study has produced estimates of the prevalence of problem drug use in England that are more robust, more precise, and suggest a higher prevalence than previous studies. The estimates provide a basis on which to formulate policy, plan services, and measure service performance.
“…However, it is an encouraging sign for London and the North West (with high prevalence rates) that their injector age group ratios (15–34 to 35–64 years) are relatively low compared with England as a whole (posterior mean 1.59 for males and 2.24 for females; and see Millar et al . () for further detailed discussion of problem drug use in the North West up to 2001). Regions with high injector ratios by age group may have experienced later diffusion with younger injectors predominating.…”
Summary.Injecting drug users (IDUs) have a direct social and economic effect yet can typically be regarded as a hidden population within a community. We estimate the size of the IDU population across the nine different Government Office regions of England in 2005-2006 by using capture-recapture methods with age (ranging from 15 to 64 years) and gender as covariate information. We consider a Bayesian model averaging approach using log-linear models, where we can include explicit prior information within the analysis in relation to the total IDU population (elicited from the number of drug-related deaths and injectors' drug-related death rates). Estimation at the regional level allows for regional heterogeneity with these regional estimates aggregated to obtain a posterior mean estimate for the number of England's IDUs of 195840 with 95% credible interval (181700, 210480). There is significant variation in the estimated regional prevalence of current IDUs per million of population aged 15-64 years, and in injecting drug-related death rates across the gender age cross-classifications. The propensity of an IDU to be seen by at least one source also exhibits strong regional variability with London having the lowest propensity of being observed (posterior mean probability 0.21) and the South West the highest propensity (posterior mean 0.46).
“…For example, De Angelis et al (2004) find that though there is a moderate downturn in incidence between 1980 and 1985, prevalence of heroin addiction in the UK grew from 1968 to 2000, with especially large increases in the 1990s. Research from the north-west of England suggests that, during the 1990s, initiation into heroin use may have started to fall in areas which had seen big increases in the 1980s (Millar et al, 2006), even if it continued to increase in other areas.…”
Section: Heroinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few health indicators have shown such rapid deterioration over such a long period. I t a l y P o r t u g a l S p a i n A u s t r i a I r e l a n d F i n l a n d S w e d e n F r a n c e N e t h e r l a n d s G e r m a n y P o l a n d (Millar et al, 2006), even if it continued to increase in other areas.…”
Over the entire last quarter of the 20th century the British drug problem worsened, despite the implementation of a variety of approaches and commitment of substantial criminal justice and other resources. The link between chronic use of expensive drugs and property crime makes this experience important for understanding trends in crime and justice in Britain. The worsening of the problem can be seen in the growing number of new heroin users each year over
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.