1999
DOI: 10.3386/w6885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capitalization of Capital Gains Taxes: Evidence from Stock Price Reactions to the 1997 Rate Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
3
79
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in tax receipts, ceteris paribus, implies lower (future) government borrowing (and less debt) and thus a lower interest rate. This is consistent with evidence of substantial effects of a tax change on share prices as reported by Lang and Shackelford (2000) and Sinai and Gyourko (2004). Alternatively, stock market declines mean lower corporate profits and lower tax revenues, and this might necessitate higher government borrowing, which would place an upward pressure on the interest rate in the future.…”
Section: Disaggregated Deficit Measuressupporting
confidence: 85%
“…An increase in tax receipts, ceteris paribus, implies lower (future) government borrowing (and less debt) and thus a lower interest rate. This is consistent with evidence of substantial effects of a tax change on share prices as reported by Lang and Shackelford (2000) and Sinai and Gyourko (2004). Alternatively, stock market declines mean lower corporate profits and lower tax revenues, and this might necessitate higher government borrowing, which would place an upward pressure on the interest rate in the future.…”
Section: Disaggregated Deficit Measuressupporting
confidence: 85%
“…DHALIWAL, S. HEITZMAN, AND O. Z. LI or event studies surrounding changes in statutory tax rates (e.g., Ayers, Cloyd, and Robinson [2002], Lang and Shackelford [2000]). 3 A closely related paper by Dhaliwal et al [2005] uses ex ante cost of equity estimates implied by accounting-based valuation models to test whether the effect of dividend taxes is capitalized in expected returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical literature (e.g., Herron, 2000;Lang & Shackelford, 2000;Santa-Clara & Valkanov, 2003;Slemrod & Greimel, 1999) has already established that markets react to changes in the political landscape, particularly elections. Exploiting exogenous changes in prediction markets on Election Day, Snowberg, Wolfers, and Zitzewitz (2007) found that markets across the board reacted strongly to both anticipated and revealed election information.…”
Section: Broader Election Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%