2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2006.00214.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxes, Leverage, and the Cost of Equity Capital

Abstract: We examine the associations among leverage, corporate and investor level taxes, and the firm's implied cost of equity capital. Expanding on Modigliani and Miller [1958, 1963], the cost of equity capital can be expressed as a function of leverage and corporate and investor level taxes. Based on this expression, we predict that the cost of equity is increasing in leverage, and that corporate taxes mitigate this leverage-related risk premium, while the personal tax disadvantage of debt increases this premium. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
138
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
20
138
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, following Hail and Leuz (), we adopt the approaches developed by Ohlson and Juettner‐Nauroth ()( K OJN ), Easton ()( K MPEG ), Claus and Thomas ()( K CT ), and Gebhardt, Lee, and Swaminathan ()( K GLS ). Then, in line with Dhaliwal, Heitzman, and Zhen (), we subtract the 10‐year U.S. Treasury bond yield from the estimated cost of equity of each model. To mitigate the dependence of our results on a particular approach, we retain the average estimate obtained from the four models ( K AVG ) as our dependent variable (Boubakri et al, ; Boubakri, El Ghoul, and Saffar, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, following Hail and Leuz (), we adopt the approaches developed by Ohlson and Juettner‐Nauroth ()( K OJN ), Easton ()( K MPEG ), Claus and Thomas ()( K CT ), and Gebhardt, Lee, and Swaminathan ()( K GLS ). Then, in line with Dhaliwal, Heitzman, and Zhen (), we subtract the 10‐year U.S. Treasury bond yield from the estimated cost of equity of each model. To mitigate the dependence of our results on a particular approach, we retain the average estimate obtained from the four models ( K AVG ) as our dependent variable (Boubakri et al, ; Boubakri, El Ghoul, and Saffar, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of r mpeg is supported by Botosan and Plumlee () and Botosan et al () who show that this approach produces cost of capital estimates that correlate with risk characteristics in the predicted direction. In addition, following Dhaliwal et al (), we calculate r avg as the average of the ex ante cost of equity capital from four alternative models. Specifically, r avg is the average of the ex ante cost of equity capital estimates derived from models developed by Gebhardt et al (), Claus and Thomas (), Gode and Mohanram () and Easton () ,…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sample includes 597 Second‐Tier client observations and 597 Other non‐Big 4 client observations. We use two ex ante cost of equity capital estimates to proxy for investor perceptions of financial statement credibility: a measure calculated using the PEG method from Easton () and an average cost of equity capital estimate based on four alternative implied cost of equity measures as in Dhaliwal et al ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4;2016 4 from Mankiw, Romer, & Weil (1992), although their production function is slightly different. In all simulations, the interest rate and cost of capital are set to 0.1 (see e.g., Dhaliwal, Heitzman, & Li, 2006). The cost of human capital is also set to 0.1.…”
Section: Resource Extraction Climate Costs Avoided and Price Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%