2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary Trapping of CO2 in Oil Reservoirs: Observations in a Mixed-Wet Carbonate Rock

Abstract: Early deployment of carbon dioxide storage is likely to focus on injection into mature oil reservoirs, most of which occur in carbonate rock units. Observations and modeling have shown how capillary trapping leads to the immobilization of CO2 in saline aquifers, enhancing the security and capacity of storage. There are, however, no observations of trapping in rocks with a mixed-wet-state characteristic of hydrocarbon-bearing carbonate reservoirs. Here, we found that residual trapping of supercritical CO2 in a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
85
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
13
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in an earlier related work, Al-Menhali and Krevor (2016), it was 15 identified that an important trapping mechanism, residual trapping, is weakened in rocks with …”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, in an earlier related work, Al-Menhali and Krevor (2016), it was 15 identified that an important trapping mechanism, residual trapping, is weakened in rocks with …”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Table 2 lists some of the results of the N 2 capillary trapping measurements made on a water-wet limestone carbonates. Please refer to [Al-Menhali and Krevor, 2016] for final findings and complete IR results of this study. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent measurements by Al‐Menhali and Krevor [] indicate a residual nonwetting saturation (of CO 2 and N 2 in their case) of around 0.25 for initial non‐wetting saturations around 0.42, for a water‐wet Estaillades sample. At this initial saturation, almost the complete macroporosity network is drained (about 50% of the total pore volume), while the microporosity likely remained water‐filled.…”
Section: Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%