2015
DOI: 10.1080/02726351.2015.1045641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary Forces in Nanoparticle Adhesion: A Review of AFM Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The AFM force-curves are conducted at a rate of 2 kHz allowing a contact of both surfaces in the order of the milliseconds [3839] at ambient temperature (20 °C) and relative humidity around 35 ± 5%. A pure equilibrium state ensuring the constant formation of the water meniscus might be difficult to reach all the time as these values are at the formation limit, as discussed by Haugstad et al [39]; however, it is still possible and it can explain the large spread of adhesion values obtained for –NH 2 and –SH coated NPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AFM force-curves are conducted at a rate of 2 kHz allowing a contact of both surfaces in the order of the milliseconds [3839] at ambient temperature (20 °C) and relative humidity around 35 ± 5%. A pure equilibrium state ensuring the constant formation of the water meniscus might be difficult to reach all the time as these values are at the formation limit, as discussed by Haugstad et al [39]; however, it is still possible and it can explain the large spread of adhesion values obtained for –NH 2 and –SH coated NPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When plotted on a logarithmic scale, adhesion values for hydrophobic NPs can be well approximated by linear fit corresponding to an exponential decay of the adhesion with NPs size, which is known as size effect [38]. This slope is slightly higher for the –CH 3 coated NPs, indicating a stronger decrease of the input molecular interactions with the NPs size than for partially hydrophobic NPs as one could expect for the lowest nanoparticle coating adhesion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capillary force has been shown to vary with RH. It can exhibit monotonic increase or decrease, peak at certain RHs, show step-wise increases, or be independent of RH; the variations depend on particle properties such diameter, shape, surface hydrophilicity, and roughness (Butt and Kappl 2009;Harrison et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a solid surface is hydrophilic, strong interactions between the solid surface and water molecules may result in the formation of a strongly H-bonded water layer, also denoted as ordered water, solid-like water, ice-like water, or quasi-ice, in the adsorbed layer [10]. Water condensation around nanoasperity contacts varies with not only the intrinsic properties of the contacting surfaces (e.g., atomic structure, dangling bond, wettability, chemical activity, and surface roughness), but also the working conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, sliding velocity, and atmosphere) ( Figure 1) [14][15][16]. Apart from the amount of adsorbed water, the structure of the adsorbed water layer also plays a significant role in interfacial forces at the nanoasperity contact, especially under ambient conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical technique to quantify interfacial adhesion involves measurement of the pull-off force using AFM. Extensive experiments carried out in humid air show that F a is dominated by the capillary interaction, which varies with RH as well as the surface wettability or surface chemistry [14,15]. The RH-dependent F c plays an important role in adhesion behaviors.…”
Section: Brief Introduction Of Water Adsorption-dependent Adhesion Fomentioning
confidence: 99%