Deagglomeration testing of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates: Stability analysis under varied aerodynamic shear and relative humidity conditions

Abstract

2016) Deagglomeration testing of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates: Stability analysis under varied aerodynamic shear and relative humidity conditions, ABSTRACTOccupational exposure to nanomaterial aerosols poses potential health risks to workers at nanotechnology workplaces. Understanding the mechanical stability of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates under varied mechanical forces and environmental conditions is important for estimating their emission potential and the released particle size distributions, which in consequence alters their transport and human uptake probability. In this study, two aerosolization and deagglomeration systems were used to investigate the potential for deagglomeration of nanopowder aerosols with different surface hydrophilicity under a range of shear forces and relative humidity conditions. Critical orifices were employed to subject airborne agglomerates to the shear forces induced by a pressure drop. Increasing applied pressure drop was found to be associated with decreased mean particle size and increased particle number concentrations. Rising humidity decreased the deagglomeration tendency as expressed by larger modal particle sizes and lower number concentrations compared to dry conditions. Hydrophilic aerosols exhibited higher sensitivities to changes in humidity than hydrophobic particles. However, the test systems themselves also differed in generated particle number concentrations and size distributions, which in turn altered the responses of created aerosols to humidity changes. The results of the present study clearly demonstrate that (a) humidity control is essential for dustiness and deagglomeration testing, (b) that (industrial) deagglomeration, for example, for preparation of aerosol suspensions, can be manipulated by subjecting airborne particles to external energies, and (c) that the humidity of workplace air may be relevant when assessing occupational exposure to nanomaterial aerosols. EDITOR Nicole Riemer CONTACT Michael Riediker Michael.Riediker@alumni.ethz.ch Institute for Work and Health (IST), Universities of Lausanne and Geneva, Route de la Corniche 2, Epalinges CH-1066, Switzerland. Color versions of one or more figures in the article can be found online at www.tandfonline.com/uast.

New Insights Into the Composition and Origins of Ultrafine Aerosol in the Summertime High Arctic

“…Charge buildup alone probably does not suffice (Leck & Bigg, 2010). Shear forces require air velocities on the order of 100 m s −1 to measurably break up accumulation mode agglomerates (Ding et al., 2016). Steric repulsion of nanoparticles with polysaccharide chains and electrostatic repulsion of negative functional groups (typical in marine gels) can hinder aggregation in dispersions (Adroher‐Benítez et al., 2017; Bachhar & Bandyopadhyaya, 2016; Moncho‐Jordá, 2013).…”

An intercomparison exercise of good laboratory practices for nano-aerosol size measurements by mobility spectrometers

“…In this context, other intercomparison studies on PNSD measurements by SMPS were performed on TiO 2 (Leskinen et al, 2012;Ding et al, 2016). Babick et al, (2016a,b) showed for several nano-additived materials that the SMPS number-weighted median diameters deviate from electron microscopy results by a factor not larger than 1.5.…”

The effect of nanosilica (SiO2) and nanoalumina (Al2O3) reinforced polyester nanocomposites on aerosol nanoparticle emissions into the environment during automated drilling

“…A study carried out by Piccino et al (2012), surveyed companies' estimates on production of various nanomaterials and found that most companies estimated a median of 5500 tons/year of nanosilica and 550 tonnes/year of nanoalumina were produced within Europe. The introduction of these materials into the workplace institutes conceivable health risks and toxicity when human exposure is concerned (Ding et al 2016;Njuguna et al 2009).…”