2023
DOI: 10.1007/s40429-022-00461-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabis Legalization and the Decline of Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) Treatment Utilization in the US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the decline in CUD treatment admissions occurred even as the prevalence of adult cannabis use rose, 9 and risk factors for CUD associated with legalization increased. 2 Declines in both the perception of cannabis use as a harmful and perceived treatment need among those with CUD, 10,11 as well as falling rates of moderate and severe CUD among frequent cannabis users, 9 may also have contributed to the drop in CUD treatment admissions. We acknowledge several limitations to the analysis: stantial policy variations occur within categories distinguishing recreational legalization, there may be other unaccounted for factors that vary within states and over time that may affect the results, TEDS-A does not capture all CUD treatment admissions, and SUD treatment admission reporting may vary by state and year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the decline in CUD treatment admissions occurred even as the prevalence of adult cannabis use rose, 9 and risk factors for CUD associated with legalization increased. 2 Declines in both the perception of cannabis use as a harmful and perceived treatment need among those with CUD, 10,11 as well as falling rates of moderate and severe CUD among frequent cannabis users, 9 may also have contributed to the drop in CUD treatment admissions. We acknowledge several limitations to the analysis: stantial policy variations occur within categories distinguishing recreational legalization, there may be other unaccounted for factors that vary within states and over time that may affect the results, TEDS-A does not capture all CUD treatment admissions, and SUD treatment admission reporting may vary by state and year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescents and young adults are particularly prone to the negative consequences of CUD. 2 Despite evidence of generally steady or rising rates of cannabis use among these age groups, 2 however, CUD treatment admissions in the United States have declined markedly since the late 2000s. [3][4][5] One possible reason for the decline in CUD treatment admissions may be the impact of recreational cannabis legalization (adult use) on CUD treatment referrals from the criminal justice system (hereafter, CJ referrals).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) are indicative of glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration, respectively. A total of 10×10 3 ESCs and 8×10 3 EpiLCs were seeded on Seahorse XF96 plates (101085-004, Agilent Technologies) and exposed to increasing doses of Δ9-THC for 48h. On the day of the assay, cells were washed with assay medium (unbuffered DMEM assay medium [5030, Sigma Aldrich] supplemented with 31.6mM NaCl, 3mg/L phenol red, 5mM HEPES, 5mM glucose, 2mM glutamine and 1mM sodium pyruvate).…”
Section: Seahorse Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannabis is the most widely used illicit psychoactive drug in the world (U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, 2022). In the United States, an estimated 49.6 million people, roughly 18% of the population, consumed cannabis at least once in 2020, with indications that these numbers will likely increase in the coming years as attitudes and regulations change (Mennis et al, 2023;Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2020). In particular, between 7-12% of expecting women report cannabis use, predominantly during the first trimester to alleviate the symptoms of morning sickness (Chabarria et al, 2016;Volkow et al, 2019;Young-Wolff et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation