2020
DOI: 10.22336/rjo.2020.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canalicular lacerations in a tertiary eye hospital: our experience with monocanalicular stents

Abstract: Introduction: Canalicular injury is commonly encountered in lid trauma. A multitude of techniques and stents are available to manage canalicular lacerations. Monocanalicular stents offer a simple, technically easy and cost-effective solution for managing such cases. Objective: This is a retrospective review of the patients presenting with canalicular lacerations to a tertiary eye hospital from January 2014 to September 2017. We evaluated factors like time of surgery, cause of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This modified bicanalicular intubation method has recently been proven to be an effective, atraumatic procedure for managing canalicular lacerations with fewer complications compared to the traditional procedure. 12 In patients with combined upper and lower canalicular lacerations, as was the case in this patient, the Crawford stent is the preferred type of bicanalicular stent that can be appropriately utilized for the intervention. In a previous study, the MBCI was found to be an effective technique with an anatomical success rate of 97.14%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This modified bicanalicular intubation method has recently been proven to be an effective, atraumatic procedure for managing canalicular lacerations with fewer complications compared to the traditional procedure. 12 In patients with combined upper and lower canalicular lacerations, as was the case in this patient, the Crawford stent is the preferred type of bicanalicular stent that can be appropriately utilized for the intervention. In a previous study, the MBCI was found to be an effective technique with an anatomical success rate of 97.14%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…19 Raj et al, concluded that time of surgical intervention is an important predictor of final surgical success. 20 In our study, there was one patient in whom anatomical and functional success could not be achieved and we could not ascertain whether the cause was delayed repair or the deep nasal cut end and further studies are needed to assess the association of delayed repair and final outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In our series, there were 6 (1.78%) patients with eyelid ectropion and 9 (2.66%) patients with stent extrusion and/or loss because the patients had rubbed their eyes and pulled the suture out. Some previous studies showed that urgent canalicular lacerations had an anatomic success rate of 25–94.1%, a functional success rate of 58–100% ( 8 , 26 , 28 , 29 ), and an extrusion rate of 5.88–23.2% ( 8 , 16 , 30 - 32 ). Our study had a higher anatomic success rate (95.86%), similar functional success rate (89.64%), and low postoperative complication rate (4.45%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%