2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70310-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement – Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
203
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
(94 reference statements)
4
203
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Comorbidities were common, including hypertension (75.2%), diabetes mellitus (47.8%) and previous cardiovascular disease (ischemic heart disease, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease or cerebrovascular disease [44.8%]). The majority (80%) of patients fell into the high 10-year risk category (cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus or a Framingham risk score of 20% or greater) (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comorbidities were common, including hypertension (75.2%), diabetes mellitus (47.8%) and previous cardiovascular disease (ischemic heart disease, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease or cerebrovascular disease [44.8%]). The majority (80%) of patients fell into the high 10-year risk category (cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus or a Framingham risk score of 20% or greater) (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lipid profile stratified according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society cardiovascular risk category is provided in Table 2. Of note, 37% of all patients did not have an LDL-C at goal (defined as 2.0 mmol/L or greater for high risk) or intervention levels (3.5 mmol/L or greater for intermediate risk, and 5.0 mmol/L or greater for low risk [2]), including 45% of high-risk category patients. Overall, 23.3% of patients had a TC/HDL-C ratio above the guideline-recommended goal (high risk 4 or greater) or intervention levels (intermediate risk 5 or greater, and low risk 6 or greater), including 27.5% of high-risk patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We previously assessed the 2003 Canadian recommendations from a population perspective (2) and found that they performed worse than those of other countries' recommendations. We now provide an updated assessment for the most recent (2006) changes to the Canadian recommendations (3). A detailed description of our methodology, including the assumptions of our model, can be found in the accompanying Appendixes 1 to 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%