2015
DOI: 10.1177/2158244015580379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Voter Identification Laws Increase Electoral Participation in the United States? Probably Not—A Simple Model of the Voting Market

Abstract: Proponents of voter photographic identification (ID) laws in the United States have argued that such measures can increase overall voter turnout. The implications of this proposition contradict classic models of voting behavior, which state that voting costs and electoral participation are inversely related. The present article/research note explores this tension in the context of some fundamental economic concepts. Namely, after identifying characteristics of a voting "market" that might facilitate the outcom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most theories of participation would predict these laws will demobilize voters, at least marginally. Weaver () formalizes the expectation drawn from Downs () that the impact of these laws on the costs to participation should outweigh any reasonably sized psychological benefits due to perceptions that the system is free of voter fraud. In addition, there is no evidence that concerns about vote fraud are very large or that they vary systematically as a function of the stringency of the voter identification requirements at the state level (Ansolabehere & Persily, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most theories of participation would predict these laws will demobilize voters, at least marginally. Weaver () formalizes the expectation drawn from Downs () that the impact of these laws on the costs to participation should outweigh any reasonably sized psychological benefits due to perceptions that the system is free of voter fraud. In addition, there is no evidence that concerns about vote fraud are very large or that they vary systematically as a function of the stringency of the voter identification requirements at the state level (Ansolabehere & Persily, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such theories predict that the weighing of costs and benefits, as well as access to information about elections and candidates, influences who is likely to participate or not. For would-be voters, ID requirements could add to the burden or cost of voting (Hajnal et al 2017;Highton 2017;Larocca and Klemanski 2011;Weaver 2015), leading to lowered likelihood of participation. In this way, voter ID rules may illustrate how electoral policies "set constraints and boundaries for political participation" (Jones-Correa 2001:42).…”
Section: Why Voter Ids Might Suppress Voting and For Whom?mentioning
confidence: 99%