2005
DOI: 10.2980/i1195-6860-12-1-68.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can intra-specific variation in carnivore home-range size be explained using remote-sensing estimates of environmental productivity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
135
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
135
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, food availability, habitat productivity and even seasonality have been important predictors of home range size in mammals (Harestad and Bunnel 1979;Tufto et al 1996;Ferguson et al 1999;Grigione et al 2002;Nilsen et al 2005). Much of the variation in home range size of carnivores is due to these same factors (Grigione et al 2002;Nilsen et al 2005). However, Grigione et al (2002) revealed that sex might be a strong determinant of home range size in some carnivores.…”
Section: I�����������mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, food availability, habitat productivity and even seasonality have been important predictors of home range size in mammals (Harestad and Bunnel 1979;Tufto et al 1996;Ferguson et al 1999;Grigione et al 2002;Nilsen et al 2005). Much of the variation in home range size of carnivores is due to these same factors (Grigione et al 2002;Nilsen et al 2005). However, Grigione et al (2002) revealed that sex might be a strong determinant of home range size in some carnivores.…”
Section: I�����������mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, carnivores tend to have larger home ranges than omnivores of the same body mass, which in turn have larger home ranges than herbivores (Kelt and Van Vuren 2001). In this regard, food availability, habitat productivity and even seasonality have been important predictors of home range size in mammals (Harestad and Bunnel 1979;Tufto et al 1996;Ferguson et al 1999;Grigione et al 2002;Nilsen et al 2005). Much of the variation in home range size of carnivores is due to these same factors (Grigione et al 2002;Nilsen et al 2005).…”
Section: I�����������mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk of predation often translates into occupation of lower quality areas that can negatively affect the fitness of the smaller carnivores, resulting in lower reproductive success and survival rates (Brook et al 2012;Ritchie and Johnson 2009). As a result, larger carnivores exclude smaller ones from higher resource areas or from larger prey (Davis et al 2011;Nilsen et al 2005;Prugh et al 2009). However, the degree of the effect of top predators and the coexistence among predators may depend on habitat productivity (as related to prey availability) and habitat complexity, as has been seen among raptors (Chakarov and Krüger 2010 (Cupples et al 2011), dingoes are the largest mammalian predator in Australia.…”
Section: Interactions Among Predatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the associations are nuanced and complex, at the most simplistic level increased vegetation productivity generates more energy available to support species and therefore higher biodiversity [32][33][34][35][36][37]. More specifically, derivatives of fPAR have been related to species distribution and diversity [28,38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%