2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can alcohol make you happy? A subjective wellbeing approach

Abstract: There are surprisingly few discussions of the link between wellbeing and alcohol, and few empirical studies to underpin them. Policymakers have therefore typically considered negative wellbeing impacts while ignoring positive ones, used gross overestimates of positive impacts via a naïve 'consumer surplus' approach, or ignored wellbeing completely. We examine an alternative subjective wellbeing method for investigating alcohol and wellbeing, using fixed effects analyses of the associations between drinking and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, this work enabled to analyse alcohol and tobacco consumption together, identifying correlations between behaviours, and pointing out variables that could be used as policy instruments to develop concerted policies. This topic deserves further attention and investigation, namely from a policy perspective, given that prevention policies should take into account the links between behaviours 67 , and eventually disparities among different types of drinkers 68 . It could be useful to consider distinct measures of alcohol addiction, given that the limited available evidence suggests that the prevalence of tobacco use varies among levels of alcohol consumption 69 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, this work enabled to analyse alcohol and tobacco consumption together, identifying correlations between behaviours, and pointing out variables that could be used as policy instruments to develop concerted policies. This topic deserves further attention and investigation, namely from a policy perspective, given that prevention policies should take into account the links between behaviours 67 , and eventually disparities among different types of drinkers 68 . It could be useful to consider distinct measures of alcohol addiction, given that the limited available evidence suggests that the prevalence of tobacco use varies among levels of alcohol consumption 69 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also extended previous work in this area by adding to the list of assessed situational cues to include self-reported physiological states that inform well-being (e.g. Jackowska, Ronadlson, Brown, & Steptoe, 2016;Geiger & MacKerron, 2016). We predicted that sleeping and eating enough benefitted mood and also, that having experienced intoxication through alcohol or other substances enhanced mood (Geiger & MacKerron, 2016).…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Jackowska, Ronadlson, Brown, & Steptoe, 2016;Geiger & MacKerron, 2016). We predicted that sleeping and eating enough benefitted mood and also, that having experienced intoxication through alcohol or other substances enhanced mood (Geiger & MacKerron, 2016). With regard to (c), we predicted that being at home or work was unrelated cognitive function, because both places were assumed to offer similar degrees of distraction.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thirdly, we can also see applications for practice theory in considering the consumption to harm relationship in ways that take us beyond risk functions where incremental differences in risk are calculated on the basis of grams ethanol consumed and, occasionally, frequencies of heavy drinking. Research is starting to point to the context‐specificity of drinking outcomes , highlighting that elements of drinking practices other than consumption volume (e.g. drinking location and venue, occasion type, companions, glassware, transportation and shared understandings of the appropriate drinking levels for different occasions) are likely to explain variations in both levels and types of harms (and benefits) experienced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%