1986
DOI: 10.1177/106591298603900408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Campaign Spending on California Ballot Propositions, 1924-1984: Trends and Voting Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by studies showing that when one side has more money than the other, rejection efforts are more effective (Lowenstein 1982;Owens and Wade 1986;Magleby 1984). Bowler and Donovan (1998) find similar results.…”
Section: Broder 2000; Garrett and Gerber 2001)supporting
confidence: 54%
“…This is supported by studies showing that when one side has more money than the other, rejection efforts are more effective (Lowenstein 1982;Owens and Wade 1986;Magleby 1984). Bowler and Donovan (1998) find similar results.…”
Section: Broder 2000; Garrett and Gerber 2001)supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Spending on ballot measures in California was remarkably stable from 1924 to 1984 (Owens and Wade 1986). Increases in campaign expenditures in the Pacific Northwest between 1980 and 1988 varied by the degree of legislative professionalization, and a widening gap between incumbents and challengers was evident (Moncrief 1992).…”
Section: Electionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Price (1975) finds that Western states are more likely to provide for the use of initiatives, and their electorate votes on initiatives with greater frequency as compared with the behavior in Eastern states. Owens and Wade (1986) find that the probability that a proposition passes and the inflation adjusted campaign related expenditures have both been stable over time. 3 Zisk (1987) examines the decrease in participation on propositions compared to top candidate races by using aggregate election results and survey data f r om four states over five years.…”
Section: Theory Of Proposition Votingmentioning
confidence: 87%