1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01499095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing absentee and precinct voters: Voting on direct legislation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example of the latter approach,Dubin and Kalsow (1996), discuss ''patience'' in the context of whether individuals will vote on ballot propositions. In their analysis, the length of the ballot propositions tries an individual's patience; ''the longer the description of the proposition, the more impatient the voter becomes, and the less support the proposition receives'' (p. 407).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example of the latter approach,Dubin and Kalsow (1996), discuss ''patience'' in the context of whether individuals will vote on ballot propositions. In their analysis, the length of the ballot propositions tries an individual's patience; ''the longer the description of the proposition, the more impatient the voter becomes, and the less support the proposition receives'' (p. 407).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their analysis, the length of the ballot propositions tries an individual's patience; ''the longer the description of the proposition, the more impatient the voter becomes, and the less support the proposition receives'' (p. 407). We conceptualize patience as an individual-level disposition, whereasDubin and Kalsow (1996) view (im-) patience as induced by the political environment, the length of ballot propositions. 3 ''A serious limitation of self-report information is that each person has only a limited awareness of his or her moods, motives, and bases for behavior, and it is not obvious that only conscious intentions and moods make up the main basis for variation(Wilson, Hull, & John 1981)'', cited inKagan (1988, p. 617).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the factors that affect voters' preferences for using different voting methods are likely to also affect their candidate preferences. For instance, previous research has generally shown that Election Day voters are younger, less educated, and less partisan-all factors that affect vote choice (Patterson and Caldeira 1985;Dubin and Kalsow 1996;Stein 1998;Baretto et al 2006;Stein et al 2004, though see Neeley and Richardson 2001 for an alternate account). This creates what social scientists often refer to as an ''identification problem''-we cannot determine whether observed differences in the vote choices made by VBM and polling place voters represent the effect of VBM or instead the preferences of those who choose to use the different voting methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unexpected behaviour was first detected by Dubin and Kaslow amongst absentee voters in California ballot propositions. 19 The same characteristic is evident in these Texas counties when partisan and nonpartisan local elections coincide. Early voters roll off less than election-day voters in every partisan contest.…”
Section: Undervotingmentioning
confidence: 55%