2006
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.46.623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of Thermophysical Properties of Ni-based Superalloys

Abstract: Reliable thermophysical data of Ni-based superalloys are needed for the mathematical modelling of solidification in casting applications. This paper derives equations and procedures to calculate the following properties of these alloys from chemical composition of the alloy: the gЈ phase content, liquidus and solidus temperatures, density and thermal expansion coefficient, heat capacity and enthalpy, electrical resistivity, thermal diffusivity and conductivity, viscosity, surface tension and contact angle. Est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
4
37
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface tension values of both ternary alloy systems calculated by the Toop model differ up 4.2 % from the new experimental values and all ternary values are slightly lower with respect to the Al-Ni values predicted by the CFM(Table 4). A comparison of measured and calculated values for the Ni-based superalloys analyzed is listed inTable 4, indicating that both model-based predictions substantiate fairly well the new surface tension experimental data and can be interpreted as a lower bound for the measured values in agreement with the findings reported by Mills et al[21] related to uncertainty in the model-based predictions for different thermophysical properties of Ni-based superalloys. Indeed, in the case of surface tension, an uncertainty of about ±5 % was found.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The surface tension values of both ternary alloy systems calculated by the Toop model differ up 4.2 % from the new experimental values and all ternary values are slightly lower with respect to the Al-Ni values predicted by the CFM(Table 4). A comparison of measured and calculated values for the Ni-based superalloys analyzed is listed inTable 4, indicating that both model-based predictions substantiate fairly well the new surface tension experimental data and can be interpreted as a lower bound for the measured values in agreement with the findings reported by Mills et al[21] related to uncertainty in the model-based predictions for different thermophysical properties of Ni-based superalloys. Indeed, in the case of surface tension, an uncertainty of about ±5 % was found.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…It is worth to be noted that the differences between the present experimental data and those predicted become larger from the alloy melting point to the end of the temperature interval of measurements due to different density temperature coefficients with respect to the calculated curves [15,21].…”
Section: Densitymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another model was suggested by Mills [29] giving the theoretical relationship between density and temperature, as follows: (8) In this case, the deviation between the measured data and the calculated values was less than 1.5%.…”
Section: Density Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the thermal expansion of any coatings applied to a heater plate would need to be well matched, these data for nickel 201 can be used when selecting high-temperature, high-emissivity coatings. These data could also be used for verifying the models that calculate the thermophysical properties of nickel-based alloys [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%