2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the surface binding energy for ion sputtered particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Atomic mass and the approximate target surface binding energies or sublimation energies (which affect the sputter yields) are also provided. 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic mass and the approximate target surface binding energies or sublimation energies (which affect the sputter yields) are also provided. 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mica specimen was irradiated with alpha particles and the ejection of atoms was detected on the other side, along closed packed lines. The ejected atoms could not been identified and also sputtering energies are not known exactly, however from experimental and theoretical studies, they are known to be in the range of 4-8 eV (Kudriavtsev et al, 2005).…”
Section: Motivation: Dynamics Of Potassium Ions In Layered Silicatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that a physical sputtering yield is a function of incident ion energy. The Bohdansky formulae for physical sputtering yield has been given as [16], [17] …”
Section: Wall-sputtering Models For Iter-like Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ǫ is defined to be E 0 /E T F where E 0 and E T F are the ion wall-impacting energy and the Thomas-Fermi energy, respectively [16], [17]. Assuming a typical sheath formation of negative potential at the wall [18], the ion wall-impacting energy E 0 can be calculated as 2kT i + 3kT e .…”
Section: Wall-sputtering Models For Iter-like Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%