System Specification &Amp; Design Languages
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48734-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C/C++ Based System Design Flow using SpecC, VCC and SystemC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several C/C++ language based approaches such as SystemC, SpecC are primarily aimed at making the C language usable for hardware and software design and allow efficient and early simulation, synthesis, and/or verification [2]. However, these approaches do not facilitate modeling of applications at a level of abstraction that enables algorithmic analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several C/C++ language based approaches such as SystemC, SpecC are primarily aimed at making the C language usable for hardware and software design and allow efficient and early simulation, synthesis, and/or verification [2]. However, these approaches do not facilitate modeling of applications at a level of abstraction that enables algorithmic analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some of them, like the Ptolemy tool [2], don't support a layered abstraction level design approach and use a single specification including both functional behavior and architecture models. Others support the platform-based design approach (like Metropolis [3]) or the top-down design methodology (like SpecC [4]). However, it is demonstrated that the Y-chart layer's based approach, which is followed by several recent works, became nowadays the most popular and used for designing heterogeneous multiprocessors embedded systems.…”
Section: System-level Exploration Tools Comparative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the differences among the seven tools are not absolute, the features shown in Table 1 indicate that the most preferable methodologies/tools are Metropolis, VCC [4], and Sesame-like [5,6], because they have the largest amount of positive marks ("+"). By elimination, the Metropolis environment is excluded of the most preferable methodologies list since it does not facilitate explicitly the Y-chart approach.…”
Section: System-level Exploration Tools Comparative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several C/C++ language based approaches such as SystemC, Handel-C, SpecC are primarily aimed at making the C language usable for hardware and software design and allow efficient and early simulation, synthesis, and/or verification [1], [2]. However, these approaches do not facilitate modeling of kernels at a level of abstraction that enables algorithmic analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workbench Configuration (1): In this step, the designer analyzes the kernel to define a domain specific model. However, the designer does not derive any of the functions associated with the model.…”
Section: Design Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%