System Dynamics 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8790-0_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Policy and Strategy, System Dynamics Applications to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… Systemic and cybernetics approaches are ideal to be embedded within the VSM approach applied here, so that for doing a deep study of System 5, soft systems methodology (SSM) (Checkland 1981 ; Checkland and Scholes 1990 ), critical systems thinking (Jackson 2000 , 2003 , 2019 ), mind mapping (Buzan 2013 ), cognitive mapping (Rosenhead and Mingers 2001 ), strategic options development analysis (SODA) (Rosenhead and Mingers 2001 ), team sintegrity (TS) (Beer 1994 ), total systems intervention (TSI) (Jackson 2019 ) and social network analysis (SNA) (Borgatti et al 2018 ; Newman 2010 ) can be applied to get successful outcomes. In System 4, systemic methodologies like system dynamics (SD) (Sterman and Sterman 2000 ; Forrester 1961 ; Lyneis 1988 ) soft system dynamics methodology (SSDM) (Rodriguez-Ulloa et al 2011 ), agent based modeling (ABM) (Wilensky 2011 ), and dynamic balanced scorecards ( DBSC ) (Rodriguez-Ulloa 2010 ) can be embedded within VSM. In System 3, soft systems methodology (SSM) (Checkland 1981 ; Wilson and van Haperen 2015 ), soft-business process management (Soft-BPM) (Rodriguez-Ulloa 2020 , 2021 ), systemic methodology for risk evaluation and management ( SYSMEREM ), (Rodriguez-Ulloa, 2018 ), robotic process automation (Tripathi 2018 ), and intelligent chatbots (Sabharwal 2020 ) can be applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Systemic and cybernetics approaches are ideal to be embedded within the VSM approach applied here, so that for doing a deep study of System 5, soft systems methodology (SSM) (Checkland 1981 ; Checkland and Scholes 1990 ), critical systems thinking (Jackson 2000 , 2003 , 2019 ), mind mapping (Buzan 2013 ), cognitive mapping (Rosenhead and Mingers 2001 ), strategic options development analysis (SODA) (Rosenhead and Mingers 2001 ), team sintegrity (TS) (Beer 1994 ), total systems intervention (TSI) (Jackson 2019 ) and social network analysis (SNA) (Borgatti et al 2018 ; Newman 2010 ) can be applied to get successful outcomes. In System 4, systemic methodologies like system dynamics (SD) (Sterman and Sterman 2000 ; Forrester 1961 ; Lyneis 1988 ) soft system dynamics methodology (SSDM) (Rodriguez-Ulloa et al 2011 ), agent based modeling (ABM) (Wilensky 2011 ), and dynamic balanced scorecards ( DBSC ) (Rodriguez-Ulloa 2010 ) can be embedded within VSM. In System 3, soft systems methodology (SSM) (Checkland 1981 ; Wilson and van Haperen 2015 ), soft-business process management (Soft-BPM) (Rodriguez-Ulloa 2020 , 2021 ), systemic methodology for risk evaluation and management ( SYSMEREM ), (Rodriguez-Ulloa, 2018 ), robotic process automation (Tripathi 2018 ), and intelligent chatbots (Sabharwal 2020 ) can be applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In System 4, systemic methodologies like system dynamics (SD) (Sterman and Sterman 2000 ; Forrester 1961 ; Lyneis 1988 ) soft system dynamics methodology (SSDM) (Rodriguez-Ulloa et al 2011 ), agent based modeling (ABM) (Wilensky 2011 ), and dynamic balanced scorecards ( DBSC ) (Rodriguez-Ulloa 2010 ) can be embedded within VSM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an economic growth, if government policies can respond to challenges and can adapt, then development and progress will occur. Conversely, if they are unable to respond and adapt to challenges, they will experience setbacks, even destruction (Lyneis, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Review Economic Growth With Dynamic Cycle Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it possible to assess the behaviour of the system (which has been done by experts) in terms of value creation. In this line, despite the computational modelling challenges that complex systems represent, dynamic simulation is an ideal tool for building models that reproduce the behaviour of complex systems [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]; However, there is no universally accepted evaluation method for validating a dynamic model. Thus, the approach used in this research is to check the results in practice, using expert opinion.…”
Section: Iot Home Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%