2015
DOI: 10.1142/s0219649215500057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Framework of Metadata Change to Support Knowledge Management

Abstract: Abstract. Evolving user needs and relevance require continuous change and reform. A good digital collection has mechanisms to accommodate the di®ering uses being made of the digital library system. In a metadata management context, change could mean to transform, substitute, or make the content of a metadata record di®erent from what it is or from what it would be if left alone. In light of the evolving compliance requirements, this paper analyses the three most common types of change within metadata records a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al., ; Zavalina et al, ). Recently, an in‐depth study in which a team of researchers qualitatively categorized metadata change in digital library metadata and compared it with traditional library metadata change categories was conducted (Zavalina et al, ; Zavalina & Kizhakkethil, ; Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., ; Zavalina et al, ). Recently, an in‐depth study in which a team of researchers qualitatively categorized metadata change in digital library metadata and compared it with traditional library metadata change categories was conducted (Zavalina et al, ; Zavalina & Kizhakkethil, ; Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research method used in this study is a manual content analysis of traditional library metadata records created in MARC metadata scheme according to the new RDA cataloging rules (specifically the bibliographic records that have undergone changes) obtained from the WorldCat database (http://www.worldcat.org) and comparison with the results of the similar analysis of DC‐based metadata in a digital repository obtained in the related study (Zavalina & Kizhakkethil, ; Zavalina et al, ). The following research question guides this investigation: What are the characteristics of RDA‐based MARC library metadata change over time and how similar or different are those from metadata change in Dublin Core (DC) digital repository metadata?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another, recent, study (Tarver et al, ) was the first study to focus on examination of metadata change in a digital library. The high‐level computational analysis of metadata change in the Portal to Texas History conducted as part of Tarver et al () study, complemented by Zavalina & Kizhakkethil's () in‐depth content analysis study allowed to develop the draft general model of metadata change in digital libraries (Zavalina et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several quantitative studies attempted to identify and measure change in metadata records in digital libraries that enable metadata versioning (e.g., Tarver, Zavalina & Phillips, ; Zavalina, Phillips & Tarver, ). A qualitative research project (e.g., Zavalina et al, , 2016; Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, ; Zavalina, Shakeri, Kizhakkethil, & Phillips, ) categorized metadata change in digital library metadata and in traditional library metadata.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%