2018
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of metadata change in authority data over time: An effect of a standard evolution

Abstract: Information community creates, maintains and shares authority data through large‐scale databases of standardized digital records that describe persons, institutions, places, events, and works, as well as relations between them. This submission presents some results of the content analysis study that explores the authority data change over time in response to change in standards. We analysed over 400 thousand of authority records that comply to the new standard, Resource Description and Access (RDA) and are ava… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Major changes in metadata standards usually prompt change in existing metadata records to bring them to conformance with the new standards (e.g., Thornburg & Oskins, 2007). Several studies examined the change in small samples of library metadata records in response to transition to RDA (Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, 2015; Zavalina, Zavalin, & Miksa, 2016b; Zavalina and Zavalin, 2018). The only study so far that focused specifically on change over time in subject metadata in RDA‐based bibliographic records (Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, 2016a) relied on a small sample and did not examine any changes in records after 2015.…”
Section: Introduction and Background Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major changes in metadata standards usually prompt change in existing metadata records to bring them to conformance with the new standards (e.g., Thornburg & Oskins, 2007). Several studies examined the change in small samples of library metadata records in response to transition to RDA (Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, 2015; Zavalina, Zavalin, & Miksa, 2016b; Zavalina and Zavalin, 2018). The only study so far that focused specifically on change over time in subject metadata in RDA‐based bibliographic records (Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, 2016a) relied on a small sample and did not examine any changes in records after 2015.…”
Section: Introduction and Background Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%