2016
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality over time: A longitudinal quantitative analysis of metadata change in RDA‐based MARC bibliographic records representing video resources

Abstract: Everyday hundreds of millions of metadata records provide users access to information. To remain functional, metadata schemas changes in response to shifts in information user needs and standards of information representation. This poster presents results of the longitudinal quantitative analysis of change occurring in a select group of library metadata records over time. This study traces the evolution of a sample of OCLC WorldCat metadata records created in MARC format according to new RDA standard of inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study addresses the research gap in the area of implementation of RDA standard in authority data that are crucial for providing adequate access to information. Our quantitative analysis of change in RDA-based authority data reveals the lower overall level of editing activity than that observed by previous research for RDA-based bibliographic metadata (Zavalina, Zavalin, & Miksa, 2016). Results of our study demonstrate higher editing activity for meeting name and personal name authority data than for three other types of authority records.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…This study addresses the research gap in the area of implementation of RDA standard in authority data that are crucial for providing adequate access to information. Our quantitative analysis of change in RDA-based authority data reveals the lower overall level of editing activity than that observed by previous research for RDA-based bibliographic metadata (Zavalina, Zavalin, & Miksa, 2016). Results of our study demonstrate higher editing activity for meeting name and personal name authority data than for three other types of authority records.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…More recently, the DPLA in the US (2013–present) has expanded these efforts, similar to the Europeana project in the European Union (2008–present). Research using these large aggregations has included a number of quantitative analysis studies (Eklund et al , 2009; Greenberg, 2001; Tarver et al , 2015; Ward, 2003; Zavalina et al , 2016) to assess particular quality aspects. Generally, these aspects report on field usage (Shreeves et al , 2005) or evaluation of values within a particular field, such as the Dublin Core subject (Harper, 2016; Tarver et al , 2015) or date fields (Zavalina et al , 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major changes in metadata standards usually prompt change in existing metadata records to bring them to conformance with the new standards (e.g., Thornburg & Oskins, 2007). Several studies examined the change in small samples of library metadata records in response to transition to RDA (Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, 2015; Zavalina, Zavalin, & Miksa, 2016b; Zavalina and Zavalin, 2018). The only study so far that focused specifically on change over time in subject metadata in RDA‐based bibliographic records (Zavalina, Shakeri, & Kizhakkethil, 2016a) relied on a small sample and did not examine any changes in records after 2015.…”
Section: Introduction and Background Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%