2004
DOI: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000100906.09524.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Is Not Associated with Ultrasound-Defined Cerebral White Matter Damage in Preterm Newborns

Abstract: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and cerebral white matter damage (WMD) are neonatal disorders that occur most commonly in those who are born much before term. In a large multicenter database, we sought to determine whether the two disorders occur together more frequently than expected and whether BPD and other neonatal respiratory characteristics are more common among infants who develop ultrasound-defined WMD than among those who do not. In a sample of 904 infants who were born before the 30th week of gestat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of these issues, we recently analyzed a large database of 904 infants born before the 30th week of gestation [29]. In support of the previous findings [20][21][22], we did not find that BPD (defined as oxygen dependence at 36 postmenstrual weeks) and WMD (defined as echolucency on neonatal ultrasound scans) occur together more frequently than expected by chance.…”
Section: A Paradox?supporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In light of these issues, we recently analyzed a large database of 904 infants born before the 30th week of gestation [29]. In support of the previous findings [20][21][22], we did not find that BPD (defined as oxygen dependence at 36 postmenstrual weeks) and WMD (defined as echolucency on neonatal ultrasound scans) occur together more frequently than expected by chance.…”
Section: A Paradox?supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Any failure to find that WMD and BPD occur together might be due to chance, bias or confounding, the three classic sources of error in observational research. One way to reduce the likelihood of chance is calculating p values and 95%-confidence intervals for all effect estimates [29]. Nevertheless, a residual likelihood of erroneously rejecting the null hypothesis always remains present, even when smaller than 5%.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations