No abstract

To measure the neuropsychologic effects of unidentified childhood exposure to lead, the performance of 58 children with high and 100 with low dentine lead levels was compared. Children with lead levels scored significantly less well on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised) than those with low lead levels. This difference was also apparent on verbal subtests, on three other measures of auditory or speech processing and on a measure of attention. Analysis of variance showed that none of these differences could be explained by any of the 39 other variables studied. Also evaluated by a teachers' questionnaire was the classroom behavior of all children (2146 in number) whose teeth were analyzed. The frequency of non-adaptive classroom behavior increased in a dose-related fashion to dentine lead level. Lead exposure, at doses below those producing symptoms severe enough to be diagnosed clinically, appears to be associated with neuropsychologic deficits that may interfere with classroom performance.

No abstract

To determine whether the effects of low-level lead exposure persist, we reexamined 132 of 270 young adults who had initially been studied as primary school-children in 1975 through 1978. In the earlier study, neurobehavioral functioning was found to be inversely related to dentin lead levels. As compared with those we restudied, the other 138 subjects had had somewhat higher lead levels on earlier analysis, as well as significantly lower IQ scores and poorer teachers' ratings of classroom behavior. When the 132 subjects were reexamined in 1988, impairment in neurobehavioral function was still found to be related to the lead content of teeth shed at the ages of six and seven. The young people with dentin lead levels greater than 20 ppm had a markedly higher risk of dropping out of high school (adjusted odds ratio, 7.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 40.7) and of having a reading disability (odds ratio, 5.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 19.7) as compared with those with dentin lead levels less than 10 ppm. Higher lead levels in childhood were also significantly associated with lower class standing in high school, increased absenteeism, lower vocabulary and grammatical-reasoning scores, poorer hand-eye coordination, longer reaction times, and slower finger tapping. No significant associations were found with the results of 10 other tests of neurobehavioral functioning. Lead levels were inversely related to self-reports of minor delinquent activity. We conclude that exposure to lead in childhood is associated with deficits in central nervous system functioning that persist into young adulthood.

In a prospective cohort study of 249 children from birth to two years of age, we assessed the relation between prenatal and postnatal lead exposure and early cognitive development. On the basis of lead levels in umbilical-cord blood, children were assigned to one of three prenatal-exposure groups: low (less than 3 micrograms per deciliter), medium (6 to 7 micrograms per deciliter), or high (greater than or equal to 10 micrograms per deciliter). Development was assessed semiannually, beginning at the age of six months, with use of the Mental Development Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (mean +/- SD, 100 +/- 16). Capillary-blood samples obtained at the same times provided measures of postnatal lead exposure. Regression methods for longitudinal data were used to evaluate the association between infants' lead levels and their development scores after adjustment for potential confounders. At all ages, infants in the high-prenatal-exposure group scored lower than infants in the other two groups. The estimated difference between the overall performance of the low-exposure and high-exposure groups was 4.8 points (95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 7.3). Between the medium- and high-exposure groups, the estimated difference was 3.8 points (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 6.3). Scores were not related to infants' postnatal blood lead levels. It appears that the fetus may be adversely affected at blood lead concentrations well below 25 micrograms per deciliter, the level currently defined by the Centers for Disease Control as the highest acceptable level for young children.

No abstract

Epidemiologists have grouped the multiple disorders that lead to preterm delivery before the 28th week of gestation in a variety of ways. The authors sought to identify characteristics that would help guide how to classify disorders that lead to such preterm delivery. They enrolled 1,006 women who delivered a liveborn singleton infant of less than 28 weeks' gestation at 14 centers in the United States between 2002 and 2004. Each delivery was classified by presentation: preterm labor (40%), prelabor premature rupture of membranes (23%), preeclampsia (18%), placental abruption (11%), cervical incompetence (5%), and fetal indication/intrauterine growth restriction (3%). Using factor analysis (eigenvalue = 1.73) to compare characteristics identified by standardized interview, chart review, placental histology, and placental microbiology among the presentation groups, the authors found 2 broad patterns. One pattern, characterized by histologic chorioamnionitis and placental microbe recovery, was associated with preterm labor, prelabor premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, and cervical insufficiency. The other, characterized by a paucity of organisms and inflammation but the presence of histologic features of dysfunctional placentation, was associated with preeclampsia and fetal indication/intrauterine growth restriction. Disorders leading to preterm delivery may be separated into two groups: those associated with intrauterine inflammation and those associated with aberrations of placentation.

IntroductionIn the late 1990's, we designed and laid the foundations for a study intended to advance our understanding of what contributes to brain damage in extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs). Our planning considered the following: A model of brain damage in the preterm newbornWe postulate that the preterm newborn is at very high risk of brain damage, for at least three reasons.First, the very processes that lead to preterm delivery can contribute to brain damage.(1-3) These processes, which are likely inflammatory, involve the fetus,(4) are complex,(5-10) probably persist for days if not weeks,(11) and need not be initiated by microorganisms. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Conflict of interests:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests. NIH Public Access Author ManuscriptEarly Hum Dev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 1. Published in final edited form as:Early Hum Dev. 2009 November ; 85(11): 719-725. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.060. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptOriginally our focus was on inflammatory exposures associated with preterm labor and prelabor premature rupture of membranes, but has since been expanded to the processes that impair fetal growth as well.Second, the developmental processes during the 23 rd through 27 th weeks of gestation might be among the most vulnerable. The transformation of oligodendrocyte precursor to oligodendrocyte is one maturational process that appears particularly vulnerable. (13) Another is the migration of neuron precursors from the germinal plate to their final destination. (14,15) In addition, excitatory neurotransmitter pathways are up-regulated in the immature brain, apparently to faciliate neuronal migration, division, and organization, and the development of synapses and synaptic networks.(16) This heightened excitatory state enhances the vulnerability of the brain to excitotoxic injury from inflammatory or metabolic disorders.Third, ELGANs are born before they can synthesize adequate amounts of proteins normally provided by the placenta/mother. These proteins, many of which satisfy criteria for being called neurotrophins because they promote the differentiation/maturation of neurons and oligodendroglia, have the capacity to protect these cells against perturbation/adversity. (17,17,18) The combination of a potentially damaging exposure, easily disturbed developmental processes, and the lack of protection against the disturbances provoked by the damaging exposure are what we think make the developing brain so vulner...