Bridging Indonesia’s Digital Divide: Rural-Urban Linkages?

Abstract

While Indonesia is recorded as one of the greatest social media republics in the world, the gap of rural-urban internet access remains a great challenge. As reported in the 2016 Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Indicators, the number of households with internet access in rural areas is nearly half of those in urban areas; 26.3% and 48.5% in a consecutive way. Rather than simply seeing the internet as a medium, this paper discusses the internet as material culture; therefore, it goes beyond the access and focuses on the ways people use the internet to define their culture. From this perspective, this paper draws the two levels of the digital divide of Indonesian rural-urban dwellers. Lack of motivation and limited material access due to social inequality is at the very base of the digital divide. Subsequently, digital skills and usage deepen the digital divide. While splitting people into either rural or urban categories often produces misleading policies, this paper proposes the rural-urban linkages to bridge the digital divide in Indonesia. The rural-urban linkages particularly incorporate the flow of people and information across space as well as the interconnection between sectors, such as agriculture and service.

The other space of social media: Concept study of heterotopia on Instagram

“…The gaps in the access to the digital world are still a major factor generally. Rural and urban communities in Indonesia, according to Indicators Communication Technology (ICT), consist of households who are able to access the internet by only 26.3% and 48.5% respectively (Hadi 2018). Not even half of the total population in Indonesia is able to access the internet, according to these statistics.…”

Revisiting Indonesia’s Economic Diplomacy in the Age of Disruption: Towards Digital Economy and Innovation Diplomacy

“…Although some nationwide infrastructure gap may be narrowed down by providing more information communication technology (ICT) facilities, the rest of the division problems remains intact. Among those are 1) income or financial status and technophobia cause a low motivation of using the internet; 2) contribution of internet users between West-East and urban-rural areas in the countries is still unequal; 3) low education level disfavours Indonesian digital skills; 4) because of low digital skills, usage of internet or digital technology produces the limited benefits of productive activities for society (APJII & Polling Indonesia, 2018;Hadi, 2018). The remaining digital divide demonstrated how digital technology development has not been able to overcome inequality that inclines to favour skilled and high-income groups, instead of unskilled and low-income workforces (Fuady, 2019).…”

Dilema Dwifungsi Pemanfaatan Informasi Dalam Pembentukan Ketimpangan Sosial Baru Di Indonesia (Telaah Sosiologi Digital Melalui Perspektif Interaksionisme Simbolik)

“…Apabila dilihat dari trennya, maka seluruh wilayah Indonesia terus mengalami pertumbuhan secara maksimal untuk pengklasifikasian masyarakatnya yang memiliki smartphone (BPS 2018). Tentunya, bila tidak disikapi secara sosiologi, maka dampak baru yang berkaitan dengan masalah sosial seperti ketertinggalan maupun kemiskinan dapat terjadi (Hadi 2018). Apalagi di dalam kepemilikkan perangkat digital tersebut ada substansi terkait peredaran informasi pada sebuah platform sebagaimana saat ini memengaruhi interaksi sosial beserta keuntungannya (Angelina 2018…”