2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2006356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast compression simulation using ICP-based B-spline deformation for correspondence analysis in mammography and MRI datasets

Abstract: Mammography is the most commonly used imaging modality in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. The analysis of 2D mammographic images can be difficult due to the projective nature of the imaging technique and poor contrast between tumorous and healthy fibro-glandular tissue. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can overcome these disadvantages by providing a 3D dataset of the breast. The detection of corresponding image structures is challenging due to large breast deformations during the image… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Had corresponding mammograms been available, an alternative method would have been to use an iterative surface based registration algorithm similar to Krüger et al to provide a mapping between the bCT data and a compressed shell developed from the mammogram. 40 It should also be noted that the desired thickness specified by the user may intentionally differ from the compressed thickness that may actually occur in a corresponding mammogram. This would allow a researcher to either include or exclude variability of breast thickness in their study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Had corresponding mammograms been available, an alternative method would have been to use an iterative surface based registration algorithm similar to Krüger et al to provide a mapping between the bCT data and a compressed shell developed from the mammogram. 40 It should also be noted that the desired thickness specified by the user may intentionally differ from the compressed thickness that may actually occur in a corresponding mammogram. This would allow a researcher to either include or exclude variability of breast thickness in their study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these modalites are not co-registered at the point of acquisition, image registration has been used to fuse them. Examples include fusion of the functional information present in MRI with the x-ray attenuation representation of mammography, Behrenbruch et al (2003) and Krueger et al (2013), registration of MRI and ultrasound to guide biopsy, Causer et al (2008), and registration of MRI and PET-CT to aid breast tumour characterisation, Dmitriev et al (2013).…”
Section: Breast Image Registration Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a 3-D imaging modality is not available, two-dimensional (2-D) mammography [19] has also been used to provide the shape information. In such case, a simple way to recover a 3-D breast surface is to extrude the 2-D breast contour along the compression axis [29, 30], or sweep the 2-D breast contour along the contour line extracted from an orthogonal view [31]. These methods either rely on assumptions about the 3-D location of certain features (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%