2016
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/r1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of biomechanically informed breast image registration

Abstract: Breast radiology encompasses the full range of imaging modalities from routine imaging via x-ray mammography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (both two- and three-dimensional), to more recent technologies such as digital breast tomosynthesis, and dedicated breast imaging systems for positron emission mammography and ultrasound tomography. In addition new and experimental modalities, such as Photoacoustics, Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Electrical Impedance Tomography etc, are emerging. The breast is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several groups have proposed biomechanical breast models to register uncompressed volumetric breast data to the compressed one [9][10][11][12][13][14] , or to compressed projection mammographic data 13 . Within this framework, the authors modeled the breast deformation from prone to compressed prone position assuming linear elastic materials, zero residual stress and Dirichlet boundary conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have proposed biomechanical breast models to register uncompressed volumetric breast data to the compressed one [9][10][11][12][13][14] , or to compressed projection mammographic data 13 . Within this framework, the authors modeled the breast deformation from prone to compressed prone position assuming linear elastic materials, zero residual stress and Dirichlet boundary conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several areas of research in DM and DBT, such as many of the approaches for scatter correction (Sechopoulos et al , 2007b; Feng and Sechopoulos, 2011; Feng et al , 2014; Diaz et al , 2014; Kim et al , 2015) and thickness correction (Snoeren and Karssemeijer, 2004; Kallenberg and Karssemeijer, 2012) algorithms, require simulating realistic 3D compressed breast shapes (some approaches for scatter correction such as the one proposed by Kim et al (2015) do not require this). Moreover, other areas of research like patient dosimetry (Dance, 1990; Dance et al , 2000; Sechopoulos et al , 2007a; Sechopoulos et al , 2012), breast density estimation (Pertuz et al , 2016; Gubern-Merida et al , 2014), image registration and segmentation (Richard et al , 2006; Hipwell et al , 2016), and 3D breast software phantoms (Bakic et al , 2002; Bakic et al , 2011; Wang et al , 2012; O’Connor et al , 2013; Hsu et al , 2013; Kiarashi et al , 2015) could also benefit from objective shape models of compressed breasts to improve their accuracy and relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of this research are scatter correction [7][8][9][10][11] and lesion detection algorithms. 12,13 However, other areas of research such as patient dosimetry, [14][15][16][17][18] image registration, 19,20 and 3D breast software phantoms [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] could also benefit from objective shape models of compressed breasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%