Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) as an adjunct to mammography (MX) versus MX alone and versus mammography plus ultrasound (US). Materials and methods 120 women with 142 suspect findings on MX and/or US underwent CEDM. A pair of low-and high-energy images was acquired using a modified full-field digital mammography system. Exposures were taken in MLO at 2 min and in CC at 4 min after the injection of 1.5 ml/kg of an iodinated contrast agent. One reader evaluated MX, US and CEDM images during 2 sessions 1 month apart. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve were estimated. Results The results from pathology and follow-up identified 62 benign and 80 malignant lesions. Areas under the ROC curves were significantly superior for MX+CEDM than it was for MX alone and for MX+US using BI-RADS. Sensitivity was higher for MX+CEDM than it was for MX (93% vs. 78%; p<0.001) with no loss in specificity. The lesion size was closer to the histological size for CEDM. All 23 multifocal lesions were correctly detected by MX+CEDM vs. 16 and 15 lesions by MX and US respectively. Conclusion Initial clinical results show that CEDM has better diagnostic accuracy than mammography alone and mammography+ultrasound.

Contrast-enhanced digital mammography is able to depict angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Breast compression and projective images acquisition alter the quantitative assessment of enhancement parameters.

Development of breast tumors is often accompanied by angiogenesis--the formation of new blood vessels. It is possible to image the effects of this process by tracking the uptake and washout of contrast agents in the vicinity of a lesion. In this article, a method for carrying out contrast subtraction mammography on a full-field digital mammography unit is described. Spectral measurements and modeling were performed to optimize the choice of x-ray target, kilovoltage and x-ray beam filtration for contrast digital mammography (CDM) on an available digital mammography system. Phantom studies were carried out to determine the sensitivity of CDM to iodine. Detection of iodine area densities of 0.3 mg/cm2 is possible for a circular object with a radius of 1.3 mm, which allows detection of uptake levels in the breast typically seen with cancer and some benign breast conditions. It was found that with a molybdenum anode x-ray tube, copper filtration could be used to effectively shape the x-ray spectrum to maximize the proportion of x rays with energies above the k edge of iodine. Simple logarithmic subtraction was found to be adequate in suppressing background signals dependent on the x-ray beam intensity and background thickness of the breast. The total x-ray dose from the procedure ranges between 1 and 3 mGy, similar to that from a conventional single view film mammogram. A clinical pilot study is currently being carried out to evaluate this technique.

Image subtraction in both SE and DE CEDM reduces β by over a factor of 2, while maintaining α below that in DM. Given the equivalent α between SE and DE unprocessed CEDM images, and the smaller anatomical noise in the DE subtracted images, the DE approach may have an advantage over SE CEDM. It will be necessary to test this potential advantage in future lesion detectability experiments, which account for realistic lesion signals. The authors' results suggest that LE images could be used in place of DM images in CEDM exam interpretation.

The presence of an iodinated contrast agent in the breast produced small, but significant changes in the power law parameters of unprocessed CEDM images compared to the precontrast images. Image subtraction in SE CEDM significantly reduced anatomical noise compared to conventional DM, with a reduction in both α and β by about a factor of 2. The data presented here, and in Part II of this work, will be useful for modeling of CEDM backgrounds, for systems characterization and for lesion detectability experiments using models that account for anatomical noise.

No abstract

In this study, we propose a novel approach to dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography, with the development of a dual-energy recombination algorithm based on an image chain model and the determination of the associated optimal low and high-energy techniques. Our method produces clutter-free iodine-equivalent images and includes thickness correction near the breast border. After the algorithm description, the optimal low and high-energy acquisition techniques are determined to obtain a compromise between image quality and glandular dose. The low and high-energy techniques were chosen to minimize the glandular dose for a target Signal Difference to Noise Ratio (SDNR) in the dual-energy recombined image. The theoretical derivation of the iodine SDNR in the recombined image allowed the prediction of the optimal low and high-energy techniques. Depending on the breast thickness and glandular percentage, the optimal low-energy kVp and mAs ranged from 24kVp (Mo/Mo or Mo/Rh) to 35kVp (Rh/Rh), and from 60 to 90mAs respectively, and the high-energy kVp and mAs ranged from 40kVp to 47kVp (Mo/Cu), and from 80mAs to 290mAs. We proved the better performance of our algorithm compared to the classic weighted logarithmic subtraction method in terms of patient dose and also in terms of texture cancelation, through the use of artificial textured images. Values of iodine contrast measured on phantom were close to the expected iodine thickness. Good correlation was found between the measured and theoretical iodine SDNR in the dual-energy images, which validates our theoretical optimization of the acquisition techniques.

No abstract