EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intrapatient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the configuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed.

Development and optimization of methods for adequately accounting for respiratory motion in radiation therapy of thoracic tumors require detailed knowledge of respiratory dynamics and its impact on corresponding dose distributions. Thus, computer aided modeling and simulation of respiratory motion have become increasingly important. In this article a biophysical approach for modeling respiratory lung motion is described: Major aspects of the process of lung ventilation are formulated as a contact problem of elasticity theory which is solved by finite element methods; lung tissue is assumed to be isotropic, homogeneous, and linearly elastic. A main focus of the article is to assess the impact of biomechanical parameters (values of elastic constants) on the modeling process and to evaluate modeling accuracy. Patient-specific models are generated based on 4D CT data of 12 lung tumor patients. Simulated motion patterns of inner lung landmarks are compared with corresponding motion patterns observed in the 4D CT data. Mean absolute differences between model-based predicted landmark motion and corresponding breathing-induced landmark displacements as observed in the CT data sets are in the order of 3 mm (end expiration to end inspiration) and 2 mm (end expiration to midrespiration). Modeling accuracy decreases with increasing tumor size both locally (landmarks close to tumor) and globally (landmarks in other parts of the lung). The impact of the values of the elastic constants appears to be small. Outcomes show that the modeling approach is an adequate strategy in predicting lung dynamics due to lung ventilation. Nevertheless, the decreased prediction quality in cases of large tumors demands further study of the influence of lung tumors on global and local lung elasticity properties.

Respiratory motion degrades anatomic position reproducibility and leads to issues affecting image acquisition, treatment planning, and radiation delivery. Four-dimensional (4D) computer tomography (CT) image acquisition can be used to measure the impact of organ motion and to explicitly account for respiratory motion during treatment planning and radiation delivery. Modern CT scanners can only scan a limited region of the body simultaneously and patients have to be scanned in segments consisting of multiple slices. A respiratory signal (spirometer signal or surface tracking) is used to reconstruct a 4D data set by sorting the CT scans according to the couch position and signal coherence with predefined respiratory phases. But artifacts can occur if there are no acquired data segments for exactly the same respiratory state for all couch positions. These artifacts are caused by device-dependent limitations of gantry rotation, image reconstruction times and by the variability of the patient's respiratory pattern. In this paper an optical flow based method for improved reconstruction of 4D CT data sets from multislice CT scans is presented. The optical flow between scans at neighboring respiratory states is estimated by a non-linear registration method. The calculated velocity field is then used to reconstruct a 4D CT data set by interpolating data at exactly the predefined respiratory phase. Our reconstruction method is compared with the usually used reconstruction based on amplitude sorting. The procedures described were applied to reconstruct 4D CT data sets for four cancer patients and a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the optical flow based reconstruction method was performed. Evaluation results show a relevant reduction of reconstruction artifacts by our technique. The reconstructed 4D data sets were used to quantify organ displacements and to visualize the abdominothoracic organ motion.

Modeling of respiratory motion has become increasingly important in various applications of medical imaging (e.g., radiation therapy of lung cancer). Current modeling approaches are usually confined to intra-patient registration of 3D image data representing the individual patient's anatomy at different breathing phases. We propose an approach to generate a mean motion model of the lung based on thoracic 4D computed tomography (CT) data of different patients to extend the motion modeling capabilities. Our modeling process consists of three steps: an intra-subject registration to generate subject-specific motion models, the generation of an average shape and intensity atlas of the lung as anatomical reference frame, and the registration of the subject-specific motion models to the atlas in order to build a statistical 4D mean motion model (4D-MMM). Furthermore, we present methods to adapt the 4D mean motion model to a patient-specific lung geometry. In all steps, a symmetric diffeomorphic nonlinear intensity-based registration method was employed. The Log-Euclidean framework was used to compute statistics on the diffeomorphic transformations. The presented methods are then used to build a mean motion model of respiratory lung motion using thoracic 4D CT data sets of 17 patients. We evaluate the model by applying it for estimating respiratory motion of ten lung cancer patients. The prediction is evaluated with respect to landmark and tumor motion, and the quantitative analysis results in a mean target registration error (TRE) of 3.3 ±1.6 mm if lung dynamics are not impaired by large lung tumors or other lung disorders (e.g., emphysema). With regard to lung tumor motion, we show that prediction accuracy is independent of tumor size and tumor motion amplitude in the considered data set. However, tumors adhering to non-lung structures degrade local lung dynamics significantly and the model-based prediction accuracy is lower in these cases. The statistical respiratory motion model is capable of providing valuable prior knowledge in many fields of applications. We present two examples of possible applications in radiation therapy and image guided diagnosis.

No abstract

No abstract

Statistical shape modeling is a powerful tool for visualizing and quantifying geometric and functional patterns of the heart. After myocardial infarction (MI), the left ventricle typically remodels in response to physiological challenges. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to describe statistical shape changes. Which method best characterizes left ventricular remodeling after MI is an open research question. A better descriptor of remodeling is expected to provide a more accurate evaluation of disease status in MI patients. We therefore designed a challenge to test shape characterization in MI given a set of three-dimensional left ventricular surface points. The training set comprised 100 MI patients, and 100 asymptomatic volunteers (AV). The challenge was initiated in 2015 at the Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart workshop, in conjunction with the MICCAI conference. The training set with labels was provided to participants, who were asked to submit the likelihood of MI from a different (validation) set of 200 cases (100 AV and 100 MI). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used as the outcome measures. The goals of this challenge were to (1) establish a common dataset for evaluating statistical shape modeling algorithms in MI, and (2) test whether statistical shape modeling provides additional information characterizing MI patients over standard clinical measures. Eleven groups with a wide variety of classification and feature extraction approaches participated in this challenge. All methods achieved excellent classification results with accuracy ranges from 0.83 to 0.98. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were all above 0.90. Four methods showed significantly higher performance than standard clinical measures. The dataset and software for evaluation are available from the Cardiac Atlas Project website1.

No abstract