2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakthrough Curves and Simulation of Virus Transport through Fractured Porous Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 that as the mass transfer coefficient is increased, the concentration of virus decreases along the fracture. This observation is similar to that observed by Ojha et al (2011) but the pattern of the concentration profile is completely different due to the presence of fracture-skin. When the mass transfer coefficient is zero, the relative concentration of viruses in the fracture remains as 1 up to 125 m of the fracture length.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 that as the mass transfer coefficient is increased, the concentration of virus decreases along the fracture. This observation is similar to that observed by Ojha et al (2011) but the pattern of the concentration profile is completely different due to the presence of fracture-skin. When the mass transfer coefficient is zero, the relative concentration of viruses in the fracture remains as 1 up to 125 m of the fracture length.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Sharma and Srivastava (2011) developed a numerical model to simulate virus transport through two-dimensional heterogeneous porous media at field scale to investigate the effect of inactivation and mass transfer rate constants on the relative concentration profile in two observation wells. Ojha et al (2011) recently developed a numerical model to investigate the transport processes of the movement of viruses in a fractured rock. They also simulated the experimental data of biocolloids through the fractured aquifer model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may occur by direct ingress at the wellhead via overland flow, ingress of shallow groundwater through cracked well liners or rapid transport of contaminants to the producing sections of the private source due to faulty or absent waterproofing (i.e., source‐specific characteristics). This finding is considered significant, as rapid entry of contaminated overland flow (direct wellhead ingress) or shallow groundwater infiltration (bypass flow) may result in higher viable bacterial concentrations in contaminated wells, due to decreased natural attenuation/inactivation in underlying subsoils through filtration and absorption and subsequently decreased residence time in the environment [ Gill et al , 2009; Ojha et al , 2011].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details about the conceptualization, their assumptions, and limitations have been reported elsewhere [ Committee on Fracture Characterization and Fluid Flow, National Research Council , ]. The governing equation for the fracture‐matrix system can be solved using either analytical techniques [ Tang et al ., ; Neretnieks , ; Grisak et al ., 1981; Bibby , ; Sudicky and Frind , ; Barker , ; Moreno and Rasmuson , ; Maloszewski and Zuber , ; Roubinet et al ., ] or numerical techniques [ Grisak et al ., ; Noorishad and Mehran , ; Huyakorn et al ., ; Sekhar et al ., ; Suresh Kumar , ; Ojha et al ., ; Joshi et al ., ]. However, the numerical techniques are more common due to its ability to handle complex initial and boundary conditions along with the sorption nonlinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, very few studies consider the nonequilibrium sorption in the fractured porous media [ Maloszewski and Zuber , ; Lee and Teng , ; Berkowitz and Zhou , ; Xu and Worman , ; Bodin et al ., , Ojha et al ., ; Joshi et al ., ; Sharma et al ., ]. Most of the available models neglect the effect of sorption kinetics in the fracture‐matrix system and are based on the local equilibrium assumption (LEA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%