2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking the Crowther limit: Combining depth-sectioning and tilt tomography for high-resolution, wide-field 3D reconstructions

Abstract: To date, high-resolution (< 1 nm) imaging of extended objects in three-dimensions (3D) has not been possible. A restriction known as the Crowther criterion forces a tradeoff between object size and resolution for 3D reconstructions by tomography. Further, the sub-Angstrom resolution of aberrationcorrected electron microscopes is accompanied by a greatly diminished depth of field, causing regions of larger specimens (> 6 nm) to appear blurred or missing. Here we demonstrate a three-dimensional imaging method th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second option utilizes the full focal series at each tilt angle to combine both high-lateral-resolution information and depth information at every tilt angle. [82,83] The amount of information sampled about the object along the projection direction is directly related to the convergence semi-angle of the STEM (±3° for α = 30 mrad), which provides the additional advantage that fewer tilting angles are required to fully sample the object. The various tilt series are combined in Fourier space using bilinear extrapolation and per-pixel weighting of all spatial frequencies to compensate for over sampling.…”
Section: Advances In Et For Physical-sciences Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second option utilizes the full focal series at each tilt angle to combine both high-lateral-resolution information and depth information at every tilt angle. [82,83] The amount of information sampled about the object along the projection direction is directly related to the convergence semi-angle of the STEM (±3° for α = 30 mrad), which provides the additional advantage that fewer tilting angles are required to fully sample the object. The various tilt series are combined in Fourier space using bilinear extrapolation and per-pixel weighting of all spatial frequencies to compensate for over sampling.…”
Section: Advances In Et For Physical-sciences Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to determine the large-scale distribution of the nanoparticles and their internal porosity provides statistical information relevant to catalytic properties of the system from a single tomography data set using focus and tilt. [83] …”
Section: Advances In Et For Physical-sciences Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was evaluated on a whole-mount macrophage cell with gold nanoparticles coated with native low-density lipoprotein (LDL) taken up into vesicles [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] (Figure 2). The cell had a total thickness of about 1 µm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to limit the beam damage and the number of projections, electron tomography methods requiring a single specimen orientation without prior knowledge are under development (Jia et al, 2014), such as depth sectioning (van Benthem et al, 2006;Van den Broek et al, 2010;Hovden et al, 2014) and methods based on electron channelling (Van Aert et al, 2007;Jinschek et al, 2008;E et al, 2010;Van Dyck et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2015). However, these methods have not yet shown evidence of atomic-scale tomography experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a method has been proposed that combines acquisition of a tilt series of images together with depth sectioning in order to increase resolution (Hovden et al, 2014). Nevertheless, although the quality of the reconstruction increases, we are still confronted with the problems of tilt limitation and beam damage of the specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%