2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2012.00461.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking Out of Co‐operation's ‘Iron Cage’:from Movement Degeneration to Building a Developmental Movement

Abstract: This article focuses on co‐operative movements’ role in developing new firms and sectors. In contrast to ‘developmental movements’ which secure legislative, policy, program, and promotional, financial, and technical assistance supports for co‐operative development campaigns, this paper investigates the problem of co‐operative ‘movement degeneration’ – why some movements’ developmental commitments gradually erode. The paper next investigates the project of ‘movement regeneration’ – how mature movements become r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a smaller but growing line of research has highlighted cooperatives' potential to regenerate; that is, to revive cooperative values and re-assemble democratically-structured forms of decision making as a reaction to degeneration (e.g. Ng and Ng 2009, Diamantopoulos 2012, Giagnocavo et al 2014, Storey et al 2014, Narvaiza et al 2017. These studies illustrate how cooperatives can regenerate by mobilizing resources to trigger organizational change, such as by reinforcing a culture of discussion and open criticism and strengthening members' active participation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, a smaller but growing line of research has highlighted cooperatives' potential to regenerate; that is, to revive cooperative values and re-assemble democratically-structured forms of decision making as a reaction to degeneration (e.g. Ng and Ng 2009, Diamantopoulos 2012, Giagnocavo et al 2014, Storey et al 2014, Narvaiza et al 2017. These studies illustrate how cooperatives can regenerate by mobilizing resources to trigger organizational change, such as by reinforcing a culture of discussion and open criticism and strengthening members' active participation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, meanwhile, have demonstrated that cooperatives and other member-based organizations can resist degeneration and achieve a healthy balance between oligarchy and democracy by both maintaining their original nature in the long term and revitalizing their democratic functioning over time (Ng and Ng 2009, Storey et al 2014, Narvaiza et al 2017. A variety of mechanisms are highlighted, including the reenactment of a democratic discourse that countervails the dominant market rhetoric (Eikenberry 2009); the reproduction of an active membership through careful selection of managers and workers and their socialization into cooperative values (Chaves and Sajardo 2004); the permanent requirement for accountability and endless overt critique of managers to circumvent the coalescence of power in their hands (Jaumier 2017); the organization of labor to reinforce a participatory culture grounded in self-determination, horizontality and solidarity (Hernandez 2006); connection to wider social movements to promote community-based goals (Diamantopoulos 2012, Langmead 2016, and the eventual 'remutualization' of cooperatives (Sousa and Herman 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the debate on how to extend/scale up the SSE without compromising its core values is a focal point. The controversies around the internationalization processes of the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation [48,49], the debates on the denaturation and demutualization processes in the social economy [50], and so-called cooperative degeneration [51,52] illustrate the limits of some of the growth models of this kind of enterprise. Nevertheless, the so called "degeneration thesis" has recently come under scrutiny.…”
Section: Sse and Its Own Particular Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La principale caractéristique d'une coopérative de solidarité est sa configuration multisociétaire, c'est-à-dire qu'elle doit compter un minimum de deux catégories de membres. La possibilité d'inclure au sein de leur sociétariat divers types de membres réaffirme avec force la dimension sociale du modèle coopératif (Defourny et Nyssens, 2010;Diamantopoulos, 2012) en proposant une structure organisationnelle qui cherche à réconcilier les besoins, à première vue contradictoires, des différents types de membres (Spear, Cornforth et Aiken, 2009). Cela dit, il existe à ce jour peu d'études sur le fonctionnement quotidien d'une coopérative de solidarité (Langlois et Girard, 2006) et aucune ne porte, à notre connaissance, sur la transformation d'un OBNL en coopérative de solidarité.…”
Section: Paradoxes Et Coopérationunclassified