Brazilian Portuguese version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR-Br): cross-cultural validation, reliability, and construct and structural validation

Lupi, Jaqueline Basilio; Abreu, Daniela Cristina Carvalho de; Ferreira, Mariana; Oliveira, Renê Donizeti Ribeiro de; Chaves, Thaís Cristina

doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1207106

Cited by 26 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, our findings showed acceptable testretest reliability but the domains of life activity and participation showed less stability in individuals with FMS after one week. These results are probably due to FMS being a health condition with a wide variety of transient symptoms [13,36], and changes may occur between two time points. We hypothesize that the WHODAS 2.0 is capable of detecting minimal changes in these domains, however, the responsiveness of this instrument needs to be tested in a future study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Considering the fact that people with one and the same clinical condition can vary substantially in terms of disability, there is a need to expand the assessment tools [3]. The instruments commonly used to assess outcomes in FMS are not aligned with all categories of functioning as defined by the ICF [13,14]. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a tool that measure functioning based on the theoretical conceptual framework of the ICF.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This version is not validated to evaluate individuals with FMS. Knowledge of the functioning profile of individuals with FMS is needed for more appropriate and effective clinical management, especially because FMS is a multifactorial and multisystemic condition [13]. The multimodal pain management approach refers to a biopsychosocial model of pain that directs attention to suffering, Quality of Life (QoL), and participation in family and other areas of social life [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Functioning in the fibromyalgia syndrome: validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is both a challenging and disabling condition. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) classifies FMS as chronic primary pain, and it can negatively impact individuals’ functioning including social, psychological, physical and work-related factors. Notably, while guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial approach for managing chronic pain conditions, FMS assessment remains clinical. The WHODAS 2.0 is a unified scale to measure disability in the light of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of WHODAS 2.0 for use in individuals with FMS. Methods Methodological study of the validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 with 110 individuals with FMS. The instrument gives a score from 0 to 100, the higher the value, the worse the level of functioning. We assessed participants with Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (0–100), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) (0–10) and Beck Depression Inventory instrument (BDI) (0–63). The construct validity, internal consistency, and test–retest stability. We used SF-36, FIQ and BDI to study construct validity analysis. For statistical analysis, we performed the intraclass correlation (ICC), Spearman correlation, and Cronbach's alpha, with a statistical level of 5%. Results Most participants were female (92.27%), aged 45 (± 15) years. The test–retest reliability analysis (n = 50) showed stability of the instrument (ICC = 0.54; ρ = 0.84, p < 0.05). The test–retest correlation between the domains was moderate to strong (ρ > 0.58 and < 0.90). Internal consistency was satisfactory for total WHODAS 2.0 (0.91) and also for domains, ranging from 0.44 to 0.81. The construct validity showed satisfactory values with all moderately correlated with WHODAS 2.0 instruments (> 0.46 and < 0.64; p < 0.05). WHODAS 2.0 evaluates the functioning encompassing components of health-related quality of life, functional impact, and depressive symptoms in those with FMS. Conclusions WHODAS 2.0 is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate functioning of Brazilians with FMS. It provides reliable information on individuals' health through of a multidimensional perspective, that allows for individual-centered care.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Functioning in the fibromyalgia syndrome: validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Data collection is done by distributing questionnaires using Google Form to students. The reason for using a questionnaire is because it can easily collect and measure all information from the research sample using a rating rating scale (Elmendorf & Song, 2015;Lupi et al, 2017). The questionnaire used in this study was made using a Likert scale to measure perception with statements that focus on a person's perspective on something (Wu & Leung, 2017;Caia et al, 2018;Ikeda et al, 2018).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mathematical physics e-module: A study of students' perception based on gender

Astalini¹,

Kurniawan²,

Kurniawan³

et al. 2021

Momentum: Physics Education Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Student’s perception is the student's assessment of something or information. The objective of this study was to discover how students' general perceptions and gender differences in electronic modules of mathematical physics. The research type is survey-based research with quantitative approach. The research population consists of physics education students from Universitas Jambi with the sample of 80 students from class A and class B. The data analysis techniques used in the study are descriptive statistics analysis and inferential data analysis using t-tests. The results showed that, overall, students have a positive perception with a Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.011 < 0.005, which means that there is a significant difference in students’ perception. The perception of class A students with gender differences has a Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.003, while the grade B students have a Sig. (2 tailed) values of 0.020 and 0.013. This means that class A and classs B students have a discernible difference of perception. Student’s perception may be used as a determining factor in the choice of learning materials. This research can be used as a guideline for the development of student perception assessment in the electronic module of Mathematical Physics in the future. The update of this study aims to compare students' perceptions of the overall online module of mathematics and gender differences.

show abstract

“…Em concordância com a proposta desse ciclo de reabilitação é essencial a participação de uma equipe multiprofissional durante todo processo de reabilitação de um paciente. Isso torna essencial a utilização de mecanismos para mensurar as respostas terapêuticas através de instrumentos funcionais específicos e validados (ORSINI et al, 2006;LUPI et al, 2017).…”

Section: I S C U S S ã O | 67unclassified

Tradução e validação do Spinal Cord Independence Measure versão IV para o português do Brasil

Soeira¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study aims to carry out the adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the SCIM IV assessment instrument in individuals with spinal cord injury. Methods: The process of cross-cultural adaptation took place in 7 stages: 1) initial translation, 2) committee composed of experts, 3) counter-translation, 4) synthesis of translations and linguistic analysis, 5) validation of the translation, 6) revision of the text and 7) test of the pre-final version of the SCIM IV questionnaire. For the psychometric evaluation, 100 individuals with spinal cord injuries were recruited. For the construct validity SCIM IV score was correlated with the score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). The exploratory factorial analysis was performed, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) was carried out to inform if the analysis is factored or not. For the criterion validity, the correlation of SCIM IV subscales with the motor FIM domains was performed. For internal consistency analysis, Cronbach's alpha was used. Reproducibility was analyzed through the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), which analyzed intra and interobserver reliability. For responsiveness a measure was used that estimates the size of the effect denominated MRP. The correlation between the SCIM IV score and the AIS motor index was analyzed. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to verify the correlations. Results: The instrument was not modified during the cross-cultural adaptation, with the same number of pages in portrait orientation, during the test of the pre-final version, health professionals did not report doubts. The correlation between a SCIM IV and a motor FIM, we obtained excellent ICC values (ρ = 0.86). The exploratory factorial analysis was calculated as appropriate (KMO = 0.87). In the validation of a criterion in the SCIM IV "self-care" and "mobility" subscales with the domains "selfcare", "mobility" and "locomotion" of the FIM we obtained an excellent agreement and the correlation between the subscale "respiration and sphincter control" from SCIM IV with the domain "control of sphincters" in the FIM, we obtained moderate agreement. As for Cronbach's alpha, the total SCIM IV result was considered within the expected (α = 0.91). A reliability analysis indicated good intra and inter-observer reproducibility. Responsiveness was low in chronic patients, but acute patients obtained a high responsiveness on the "self-care" subscale and moderate on the SCIM IV total. The correlation between an SCIM IV and the AIS motor index was considered moderate (ρ = 0.65). Conclusion: The cross-cultural adaptation of SCIM IV into Portuguese from Brazil, presented adequate psychometric indexes, guaranteeing the use of this instrument for the evaluation of functional independence in patients with spinal cord injury both clinical practice and research.

show abstract

Brazilian Portuguese version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR-Br): cross-cultural validation, reliability, and construct and structural validation

Cited by 26 publications

References 31 publications

Functioning in the fibromyalgia syndrome: validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0

Functioning in the fibromyalgia syndrome: validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0

Mathematical physics e-module: A study of students' perception based on gender

Tradução e validação do Spinal Cord Independence Measure versão IV para o português do Brasil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About