2017
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branding with the in–out effect: The impact of consonantal articulation on brand evaluation

Abstract: Recent research has shown that mouth movements, produced even during silent reading, can affect stimulus evaluation. Words featuring systematic wanderings of consonantal stricture spots ranging from the front to the rear of the mouth (inward) are preferred to words with wanderings in the opposite direction (outward). In four experiments, the authors extended this in-out effect from a basic laboratory setting to a more ecologically relevant domain and examined the boundary conditions of possible applications to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the two experiments support that the effect of username consonantal direction on perceived seller trustworthiness is resistant to the presence of other sources of seller information that are not especially diagnostic about his or her past interactions. This is in line with Godinho and Garrido's () results showing that presenting inward vs. outward words as brand names embedded in different packaging designs does not eliminate the preference for inward brand names. In the next, final experiment, we aimed at generalizing the in–out effect to a different dependent variable that may relate more directly to consumers’ behavior and choices in real e‐commerce sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the two experiments support that the effect of username consonantal direction on perceived seller trustworthiness is resistant to the presence of other sources of seller information that are not especially diagnostic about his or her past interactions. This is in line with Godinho and Garrido's () results showing that presenting inward vs. outward words as brand names embedded in different packaging designs does not eliminate the preference for inward brand names. In the next, final experiment, we aimed at generalizing the in–out effect to a different dependent variable that may relate more directly to consumers’ behavior and choices in real e‐commerce sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It shows how such a superficial and unconsciously processed name characteristic has the potential to influence trustworthiness and choice of commercial partners. Our findings also make a relevant contribution to the literature on the in-out effect, extending it to perceived trustworthiness and choice of private sellers in e-commerce sites and identifying variables containing additional seller information that do and do not block the advantage of inward usernames (see also Godinho & Garrido, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, this phenomenon has been tested and replicated in different research labs (e.g., Godinho & Garrido, 2015). The preference for inward-wandering words (over outward-wandering ones) has also been observed in different contexts such as food pictures (Topolinski & Boecker, 2016) or brands (Godinho & Garrido, 2017). In the person perception domain, inward (vs. outward) names of foreign politicians, online users or villains were always preferred (Topolinski, et al, 2014).…”
Section: The 'In-out Effect' and Impressions Of Personalitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…That is, it features outward muscle strictures, from the back of the mouth (rear tongue) to the lips. This preference for inward over outward wandering words has been demonstrated in a wide variety of experimental settings (e.g., Godinho & Garrido, 2017;Lindau & Topolinski, 2018a, 2018bSilva & Topolinski, 2018;Topolinski & Boecker, 2016a;Topolinski, Zürn, & Schneider, 2015) and across different languages and research groups (Godinho & Garrido, 2016;Kronrod, Lowrey, & Ackerman, 2014;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%