Brand image associations for large virtual groups

Abstract

2014),"Brand image and customers' willingness to pay a price premium for food brands", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 23 Iss 2 pp. 90-102 http://dx.If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -As an aid to understanding brand image and brand attitude, this paper aims to present an innovative method of capturing qualitative brand associations from very large virtual groups. Design/methodology/approach -From the target market, two familiar brands were selected: one more favored and one less favored by the market segment. Two samples of respondents engaged in a collaborative, virtual ideation session designed to elicit "top of mind" brand associations for two fast food brands, McDonald's and In-N-Out. Members of each group posted their brand associations and then rated each other's associations on the basis of agreement. Findings -Analysis provided by dialogr.com showed sharp differences between the two brand images. To independently assess brand attitude, two judges evaluated favorability of the free associations as either "good," "neutral," or "bad." The results confirmed initial expectations. The more favored brand received considerably more favorable free associations than did the less favored brand. The results are shown in qualitative word maps. Research limitations/implications -A potential limitation of this paper is that the proposed qualitative method is more applicable to well-known, familiar brands; thus these techniques may not work as well with less familiar brands. Practical implications -Virtual collaboration tools provide a proficient method of measuring brand image and brand attitudes, for very large groups. These tools are well suited for gaining greater understanding of the cognitive and affective dimensions of a realized brand position (image) as well as an aid to re-positioning an errant brand image. Originality/value -Most qualitative group interviews are limited to a small number of respondents, ranging from five to 12 people. Virtual ideation sessions, which are designed to elicit "top of mind" brand associations, enable collection of qualitative data from large groups quickly and efficiently; without the negative influences of face-to-face group interaction.

Developing a brand structure pyramid model for travel-related online social networks

“…The positive brand image of an organization affects consumer responses and probably the overall BE. Individuals with a strong, favorable brand image should be more willing to assess the brand positively (Danes et al, 2010). Consumers, who perceive positive brand image and differentiate the brand name from competitors' names, should have favorable feelings toward the brand name (Qu et al, 2011).…”

The influence of national culture and industry structure on grocery retail customer loyalty

“…An inductive, qualitative approach was adopted due to the limited nature of prior knowledge. This approach enabled the identification of new themes and the generation of new knowledge through data (Patton, 2002) and facilitated the understanding of meanings attributed by people to their intentions and behaviour (Denzin and Lincoln, 2011) that may otherwise be difficult to explore through quantitative methods (Danes et al, 2010). Focus groups were designed to collect data.…”

How Do Consumers See Firms’ Family Nature? A Review of the Literature

“…Ten papers included incidental findings on firms' family nature at the micro level of analysis. Beside the common meanings that consumers attach to firms' family nature, such as small, truthful, socially responsible, and committed to quality (e.g., see Karstens & Belz, 2006;Meas, Hu, Batte, Woods, & Ernst, 2014), these papers' incidental findings revealed how firms' family nature is salient not only in specific product categories such as organic food (Grashuis & Magnier, 2018;Karstens & Belz, 2006;Meas et al, 2014) and luxury products (Seo & Buchanan-Oliver, 2015) but also for services such as restaurants (Danes, Hess, Story, & York, 2010) and retailing (Paul, Sankaranarayanan, & Mekoth, 2016).…”