2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/1419843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BP Network Control for Resource Allocation and QoS Ensurance in UAV Cloud

Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) cloud can greatly enhance the intelligence of unmanned systems by dynamically unloading the compute-intensive applications to cloud. For the uncertain nature of UAV missions and fast-changing environment, different UAV applications may have different quality of service (QoS) requirements. This paper proposes a mixed QoS ensurance and energy-balanced (MQEB) architecture for UAV cloud from a view of control theory, which can support both hard and soft QoS ensurance with the consider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Em [Singh and Verma 2015] os autores realizam simulac ¸ões do protocolo OLSR em FANET com diferentes modelos de movimentac ¸ão e mobilidade e concluem que o protocolo precisa ser melhorado para atender a essas redes, entretanto sem apontar os pontos chaves de melhora. Pesquisas com o propósito de melhorar as FANETs estão disponíveis em trabalhos como em [Chen et al 2019], [Sliwa et al 2019], [Singh and Verma 2015] e [Gao et al 2018]. Contudo, o foco desses trabalhos é na melhoria de aspectos específicos dos protocolos como reduc ¸ão de overhead na disseminac ¸ão de pacotes de controle e reduc ¸ão de latência e não em analisar por quê esses protocolos de roteamento não atendem às demandas das FANETs.…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified
“…Em [Singh and Verma 2015] os autores realizam simulac ¸ões do protocolo OLSR em FANET com diferentes modelos de movimentac ¸ão e mobilidade e concluem que o protocolo precisa ser melhorado para atender a essas redes, entretanto sem apontar os pontos chaves de melhora. Pesquisas com o propósito de melhorar as FANETs estão disponíveis em trabalhos como em [Chen et al 2019], [Sliwa et al 2019], [Singh and Verma 2015] e [Gao et al 2018]. Contudo, o foco desses trabalhos é na melhoria de aspectos específicos dos protocolos como reduc ¸ão de overhead na disseminac ¸ão de pacotes de controle e reduc ¸ão de latência e não em analisar por quê esses protocolos de roteamento não atendem às demandas das FANETs.…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified
“…In the relevant research field about UAV cloud systems, literature [9] proposed a mixed QoS (quality of service) reassurance and energy-balanced architecture for UAV cloud system from a view of control theory. is UAV cloud system architecture intended to address the limitations of high complexity of UAV cluster and low intelligence of individual UAVs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It adopts a linear model for system identification which is not precisely enough and without taking energy consumption into consideration. On this basis, CSFD-MAC [9] proposes a cascade selftuning architecture as well as active power management, and MQEB-MAC [10] adopts a back propagating (BP) neural network to develop an all-in-one mixed QoS 2 Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing insurance and energy-balanced scheme. Although the algorithms above are verified to be valid by experiments, they still have the following limitations: Firstly, they only focus on the difference in frames but neglect the heterogeneity of the robots themselves.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%