2017
DOI: 10.1145/3132705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary First Flattening

Abstract: A conformal attening maps a curved surface to the plane without distorting angles-such maps have become a fundamental building block for problems in geometry processing, numerical simulation, and computational design. Yet existing methods provide little direct control over the shape of the attened domain, or else demand expensive nonlinear optimization. Boundary rst attening (BFF) is a linear method for conformal parameterization which is faster than traditional linear methods, yet provides control and quality… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, for parameterizations of balancing distortions, some well-developed numerical methods, including the as-rigid-as-possible surface parameterization [51,72], the most isometric parametrization [41,20], the isometric distortion minimization [59], and boundary first flattening [61], have been proposed to reach a trade-off between minimizing the angle and area distortions.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for parameterizations of balancing distortions, some well-developed numerical methods, including the as-rigid-as-possible surface parameterization [51,72], the most isometric parametrization [41,20], the isometric distortion minimization [59], and boundary first flattening [61], have been proposed to reach a trade-off between minimizing the angle and area distortions.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, methods that use spatial coordinates result in a metric that is completely flat as long as the induced map is locally injective. The method of [SC17] tries to benefit from both worlds by first using the conformal factors as variables to induce a nearly flat metric, and then switches to the spatial variables in which conformality is discretized based on the Cauchy‐Riemann equations with a pair of harmonic conjugate functions. We note that while conformal maps possess elegant theory and many useful mathematical properties, they are somewhat more restricted than necessary, sometimes engendering large isometric (scale) distortion.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[AL15] uses the former result and generalizes the bijection such that it can be applied to genus 0 surfaces with either 3 or 4 cone singularities of a specific nature. As a last example, the recent method of [SC17] computes a discrete approximation to the unique conformal parametrization, given arbitrary prescription of cone singularities. It is more general than the former methods at the expense of not having strict injectivity guarantees (though it is empirically shown to be very robust).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free boundary algorithms allow unrestricted boundary parameterizations, producing less distorted maps. Sawhney and Crane [11] presented an algorithm in which the mesh boundary is mapped to R 2 according to its shape. The parameterized boundary is then used as a constraint to produce a boundary-free parameterization.…”
Section: Angle-preserving Mesh Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%