1999
DOI: 10.1080/12538078.1999.10515394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Botanical vicariance in some mire vegetation between Hokkaido and Europe

Abstract: Botanical vicariance in some mire vegetation between Hokkaido and Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The community types observed in this study are very different for all four vegetation types compared to other regions. In addition to the Carex lasiocarpa community, only the Carex pseudocuraica community is common elsewhere, such as in Hakkaido (Julve 1999) and Russia (Botch and Masing 1983). The other vegetation types are pseudo‐vicariant(s), for example, tussock‐forming communities such as Carex appendiculata and Carex meyeriana communities, are the vicariant of the North American Carex stricta type (Lord and Lee 2001, Peach and Zedler 2006, Rydin and Jeglum 2006), Japanese Carex caespitosa, C. angustinowiczii and C. middendorffii (Nakamura et al 2002, Koyama and Tsuyuzaki 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The community types observed in this study are very different for all four vegetation types compared to other regions. In addition to the Carex lasiocarpa community, only the Carex pseudocuraica community is common elsewhere, such as in Hakkaido (Julve 1999) and Russia (Botch and Masing 1983). The other vegetation types are pseudo‐vicariant(s), for example, tussock‐forming communities such as Carex appendiculata and Carex meyeriana communities, are the vicariant of the North American Carex stricta type (Lord and Lee 2001, Peach and Zedler 2006, Rydin and Jeglum 2006), Japanese Carex caespitosa, C. angustinowiczii and C. middendorffii (Nakamura et al 2002, Koyama and Tsuyuzaki 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%