This paper provides out-of-sample forecasts of linear and non-linear models of US and four Census subregions' housing prices. The forecasts include the traditional point forecasts, but also include interval and density forecasts, of the housing price distributions. The non-linear smooth-transition autoregressive model outperforms the linear autoregressive model in point forecasts at longer horizons, but the linear autoregressive and non-linear smooth-transition autoregressive models perform equally at short horizons. In addition, we generally do not find major differences in performance for the interval and density forecasts between the linear and non-linear models. Finally, in a dynamic 25-step ex-ante and interval forecasting design, we, once again, do not find major differences between the linear and nonlinear models. In sum, we conclude that when forecasting regional housing prices in the US, generally the additional costs associated with nonlinear forecasts outweigh the benefits for forecasts only a few months into the future.