2004
DOI: 10.1385/jcd:7:4:443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Composition Measurements by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Differ Between Two Analysis Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were analyzed using the software supplied by the manufacturer. The within-participants coefficients of variation of this instrument in our laboratory have been previously reported as 2.5% for whole-body fat mass and 0.5% for lean tissue mass [17]. Abdominal fat (i.e., total abdominal fat area (TFA), visceral fat area (VFA) and abdominal subcutaneous fat area (SFA)) was measured by a computed tomography scan (Somatom AR.C; Siemens, Munich, Germany) while participants were in the supine position.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were analyzed using the software supplied by the manufacturer. The within-participants coefficients of variation of this instrument in our laboratory have been previously reported as 2.5% for whole-body fat mass and 0.5% for lean tissue mass [17]. Abdominal fat (i.e., total abdominal fat area (TFA), visceral fat area (VFA) and abdominal subcutaneous fat area (SFA)) was measured by a computed tomography scan (Somatom AR.C; Siemens, Munich, Germany) while participants were in the supine position.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various measurement values have been developed and used in clinical practice by using a BMD-measuring device. Some of the representative methods are trabecular bone score (TBS), hip structural analysis (HSA), and body composition including skeletal muscle index (SMI) [9,10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%