2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2020.0353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bipartite tracking consensus of linear multi‐agent systems with a dynamic leader under signed digraph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivated by the abovementioned review, this paper aims to find a new output to design a fully distributed static feedback, which solves the formation tracking problem of a group of 2nd-order (force-controlled) nonholonomic systems interconnected over cooperative-competitive network. To this end, this paper generalizes the preliminary results in [1,15,16,23], in which [1,23] present formation tracking controllers for nonholonomic systems by considering hand position output, and [15,16] provide partially distributed static bipartite tracking consensus controllers for general linear systems. The generalization is not trivial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Motivated by the abovementioned review, this paper aims to find a new output to design a fully distributed static feedback, which solves the formation tracking problem of a group of 2nd-order (force-controlled) nonholonomic systems interconnected over cooperative-competitive network. To this end, this paper generalizes the preliminary results in [1,15,16,23], in which [1,23] present formation tracking controllers for nonholonomic systems by considering hand position output, and [15,16] provide partially distributed static bipartite tracking consensus controllers for general linear systems. The generalization is not trivial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This interaction principle leads to communication loop issue, making the practical implementation more difficult [10]. Dynamic feedback method is developed to avoid communication loop issue, that is, construct a distributed observer that generates an estimation of leader [11,12], a dynamic compensator [13,14] or an adaptive feedback gain [15,16] that compensates the influence of unknown leader. It is worth noting that the dynamic feedback yields additional inertial effects that commonly slow down the convergence time [17], and may increase the difficulty of algorithm implementation and unnecessary computation [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… stable unstable According to the dynamic feedback linearization technology [39] that has adopted in distributed control of multi-agent systems with nonholonomic mobile robots [40,41], the dynamics of the system (1) can be linearized with the following matrices…”
Section: A Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it may be challenging for all the motors to reach the reference speed at which they must converge. To address this, we adopt a multiagent approach that designates some motors as leaders (those that have access to the required reference speed) and the remainder of the motors as followers [9], [10]. In this leader-follower situation, not all the followers must be connected to the leader; rather, only one motor may be attached to the leader.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%