2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics of the tympanic membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
129
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used their average value (16 GPa) for the Young's moduli of all three ossicles. The very high value of 20 GPa reported in Table 3 of Volandri et al (2011) was a typographical error (GPa rather than MPa) in the original paper by Gentil et al (2005) (personal communication with Gentil). The very low value of 1.5 MPa used by Lesser and Williams (1988) was for a 2-D model.…”
Section: Baseline Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We used their average value (16 GPa) for the Young's moduli of all three ossicles. The very high value of 20 GPa reported in Table 3 of Volandri et al (2011) was a typographical error (GPa rather than MPa) in the original paper by Gentil et al (2005) (personal communication with Gentil). The very low value of 1.5 MPa used by Lesser and Williams (1988) was for a 2-D model.…”
Section: Baseline Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although there is a general consensus on the inhomogeneous mass distribution in different locations of the TM, full-field quantitative data remain absent, causing authors to employ simplified thickness distributions in their finite element (FE) models. A summary of such models was composed by Volandri et al (2011), who concluded that most authors adopt a single thickness value across the entire membrane, ranging between 30 and 150 μm. Wada et al (1992) were the first to include thickness data refinement in their FE models by specifying ten different thickness regions, corresponding with the measurements by Uebo et al (1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) is skipped for the purpose of further analysis. This can be done since the expected magnitude of structural deflections for the middle ear prosthesis is small, as reported by Volandri et al [16] The wire radius is denoted by r and it is assumed that the ratio R/r is high enough so that the member curvature due to bending is not very pronounced with respect to its neutral state. Therefore the regular (straight beam) flexure formula may be used to compute the stresses distribution.…”
Section: Analytical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%