2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass-based carbon materials for CO2 capture: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biochar, as a byproduct from thermal pyrolysis of biomass under an oxygen-deficient environment, could be a promising substitute for activated carbon due to its source abundance, low cost, and renewability. In this regard, CuO is combined with biochar to construct CuO/biochar composites. Moreover, ZrO 2 addition could essentially improve the high-temperature durability of metal oxides, thus, Tang et al developed a ZrO 2 -doped CuO/biochar catalyst for mercury removal, which showed a good Hg 0 removal activity within 60–270 °C.…”
Section: Copper Oxide (Cuo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochar, as a byproduct from thermal pyrolysis of biomass under an oxygen-deficient environment, could be a promising substitute for activated carbon due to its source abundance, low cost, and renewability. In this regard, CuO is combined with biochar to construct CuO/biochar composites. Moreover, ZrO 2 addition could essentially improve the high-temperature durability of metal oxides, thus, Tang et al developed a ZrO 2 -doped CuO/biochar catalyst for mercury removal, which showed a good Hg 0 removal activity within 60–270 °C.…”
Section: Copper Oxide (Cuo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the arrangement of the carbon atoms, carbon-based materials have different morphologies. In particular, CBMs have significantly contributed toward photocatalysis because of their high surface area, outstanding conductivity, excellent chemical stability, and remarkable mechanical strength, as well as their environmental friendliness and widespread availability [ 18 ]. Considering the importance of carbon materials, their precursors must be inexpensive and effective, as well as natural and recyclable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the applications of CCUS technology have been restricted because of the high cost of the process of carbon capture, among which the capture efficiency and performance of captured materials are key factors affecting the cost of CO 2 capture. , Therefore, the development of carbon capture materials with high efficiency and high performance is the biggest challenge faced by CCUS technology. , A variety of solid adsorbents, including zeolite, , metal–organic framework (MOF), , silica material, , and carbonaceous material can be used for CO 2 capture; however, porous carbon with advantages of relatively low renewable energy, high specific surface area, chemical stability, cost effectiveness, and manufacturing maturity has been widely studied . Yet different modification techniques, like material activation or element doping, can enhance the functionality of porous carbon materials and produce a superior CO 2 capture effect. , Selecting adsorbents with considerable CO 2 adsorption capacity, rapid adsorption kinetics, and forceful selectivity and stability of CO 2 and N 2 for experiment and simulation are the key to improving CO 2 capture . With these advantages in mind, many researchers have been involved in the modification of novel solid adsorbents in order to enhance the adsorbents’ adsorption capacity and the ideal economical cost of CO 2 separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%