2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen by anaerobic culture: Prospect of anaerobic digestion and thermochemical processes combination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 288 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As proved by the analysis of variance, the lowest of the analyzed temperatures (35 • C) had a significant impact on the concentration of CO. Additionally, the correlation analysis showed that both for the 35 • C and 65 • C variants, the CO concentration was negatively correlated with the availability of oxygen, which can also be explained by the activity of CODHproducing anaerobes. In addition to species developing at temperatures >65 • C, this group also includes mesophiles, and the optimum point of their activity is in the thermal range of 30-37 • C. The strains known so far that function in the environment with CO include Methanosarcina barkeri, Methanosarcina acetivorans, Alkalibaculum bacchi, and Butyribacterium methylotrophicum (with an optimum reached at 37 • C) or Acetobacterium woodii, Rhodospirillum rubrum and Clostridium drakei (with an optimum at 30 • C) [37]. It should be emphasized that although the bacterial strains discussed above have been analyzed for CO conversion using CODH, there are no studies that analyze the ability of the same bacteria to carry out the reverse process: net CO production using the same enzyme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As proved by the analysis of variance, the lowest of the analyzed temperatures (35 • C) had a significant impact on the concentration of CO. Additionally, the correlation analysis showed that both for the 35 • C and 65 • C variants, the CO concentration was negatively correlated with the availability of oxygen, which can also be explained by the activity of CODHproducing anaerobes. In addition to species developing at temperatures >65 • C, this group also includes mesophiles, and the optimum point of their activity is in the thermal range of 30-37 • C. The strains known so far that function in the environment with CO include Methanosarcina barkeri, Methanosarcina acetivorans, Alkalibaculum bacchi, and Butyribacterium methylotrophicum (with an optimum reached at 37 • C) or Acetobacterium woodii, Rhodospirillum rubrum and Clostridium drakei (with an optimum at 30 • C) [37]. It should be emphasized that although the bacterial strains discussed above have been analyzed for CO conversion using CODH, there are no studies that analyze the ability of the same bacteria to carry out the reverse process: net CO production using the same enzyme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological processes of organic matter (OM) decomposition, both under aerobic and anaerobic conditions can generate CO. While anaerobic CO generation is relatively well understood ( Oelgeschläger and Rother, 2008 ; Andreides et al, 2022 ), the aerobic is not. Yet many industrial-scale bioprocesses involve both conditions and can be difficult to control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be attributed to that the stable reactors with limited CaO 2 addition provided suitable habitats for microorganisms, thus allowing more active microbial metabolism. 42 Similarly, the bioreactors exhibited a remarkable increase in the ATP concentration with limited CaO 2 addition (Figure 3b), indicating that limited CaO 2 addition might trigger higher energetic metabolism.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…According to the literature, ETS activity is an essential indicator of metabolic activities associated with electron transfer in cells. , With limited CaO 2 addition, ETS activity increased significantly to approximately 1.7 times of that in the unstable period (stage III), suggesting the higher microbial metabolic levels stimulated by limited CaO 2 addition (Figure a). This might be attributed to that the stable reactors with limited CaO 2 addition provided suitable habitats for microorganisms, thus allowing more active microbial metabolism . Similarly, the bioreactors exhibited a remarkable increase in the ATP concentration with limited CaO 2 addition (Figure b), indicating that limited CaO 2 addition might trigger higher energetic metabolism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%