2013
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatibility of a porous alumina ceramic scaffold coated with hydroxyapatite and bioglass

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the osteointegration and genotoxic potential of a bioactive scaffold, composed of alumina and coated with hydroxyapatite and bioglass, after their implantation in tibias of rats. For this purpose, Wistar rats underwent surgery to induce a tibial bone defect, which was filled with the bioactive scaffolds. Histology analysis (descriptive and morphometry) of the bone tissue and the single-cell gel assay (comet) in multiple organs (blood, liver, and kidney) were used to reach this aim … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also employed the Comet assay to investigate potential genotoxic effects on Saos-2 cells and found a dose-dependent increase in DNA degradation, but within the limits of safety (therefore, below any threshold of genotoxicity). Kido et al [86] used the Comet assay as a final assessment for genotoxicity on tissue samples obtained from rats that were exposed to a ceramic scaffold covered with HA and bioglass; their assays demonstrated the lack of genotoxic effects of the investigated material. Oledzka et al [87] investigated the cyto- and geno-toxicity of a new multifunctional composite based on HA porous granules doped with selenite ions (SeO 3 ) 2− , and their study proved that the investigated materials were non-gentotoxic, as demonstrated by the Umu test (carried out on S. typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002).…”
Section: Biocompatibility Assessment Of Cap-based Bioceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also employed the Comet assay to investigate potential genotoxic effects on Saos-2 cells and found a dose-dependent increase in DNA degradation, but within the limits of safety (therefore, below any threshold of genotoxicity). Kido et al [86] used the Comet assay as a final assessment for genotoxicity on tissue samples obtained from rats that were exposed to a ceramic scaffold covered with HA and bioglass; their assays demonstrated the lack of genotoxic effects of the investigated material. Oledzka et al [87] investigated the cyto- and geno-toxicity of a new multifunctional composite based on HA porous granules doped with selenite ions (SeO 3 ) 2− , and their study proved that the investigated materials were non-gentotoxic, as demonstrated by the Umu test (carried out on S. typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002).…”
Section: Biocompatibility Assessment Of Cap-based Bioceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a bladder carcinoma study, polycarbonate scaffolds exhibited parameters consistent with native gall bladder and offered a convenient new research tool (Purdum, Ulissi, Hylemon, Shiffman, & Moore, 1993). b. Porous ceramic nonmineralized or mineralized polymeric scaffolds proved useful for evaluating underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms in mineralized and nonmineralized matrices Kido et al, 2013;Zhang, Jiang, Zhang, Wang, & Zhen, 2013), as in a study of breast cancer bone metastasis (Pathi, Kowalczewski, Tadipatri, & Fischbach, 2010). b. Porous ceramic nonmineralized or mineralized polymeric scaffolds proved useful for evaluating underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms in mineralized and nonmineralized matrices Kido et al, 2013;Zhang, Jiang, Zhang, Wang, & Zhen, 2013), as in a study of breast cancer bone metastasis (Pathi, Kowalczewski, Tadipatri, & Fischbach, 2010).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, also chemical and biological surface modification strategies are difficult to develop and can often only be realized via highly aggressive approaches which affect the materials properties. 8,9 To overcome this hindrance, different surface strategies which involved the use of inorganic coatings such as glass 10,11 and hydroxyapatite [12][13][14] were followed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%