1983
DOI: 10.1306/03b5ba2e-16d1-11d7-8645000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bimodal Porosity in Oolitic Reservoir--Effect on Productivity and Log Response, Rodessa Limestone (Lower Cretaceous), East Texas Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bimodal characteristics of carbonate porosity can sometimes be inferred from mercury injection measurements [ Keith and Pittman , 1983]. To interpret the capillary pressure data of such measurements, one typically considers a conceptual model of pore space that is made up of pores (that occupy most of the volume) connected by throats (that are of negligible volume but control the percolation and fluid transport), with the implication that the mercury injection capillary pressure is inversely proportional to throat size according to the Young‐Laplace equation [ Dullien , 1992].…”
Section: Dual Porosity and Stress‐induced Damage In Limestonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bimodal characteristics of carbonate porosity can sometimes be inferred from mercury injection measurements [ Keith and Pittman , 1983]. To interpret the capillary pressure data of such measurements, one typically considers a conceptual model of pore space that is made up of pores (that occupy most of the volume) connected by throats (that are of negligible volume but control the percolation and fluid transport), with the implication that the mercury injection capillary pressure is inversely proportional to throat size according to the Young‐Laplace equation [ Dullien , 1992].…”
Section: Dual Porosity and Stress‐induced Damage In Limestonementioning
confidence: 99%